Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking To Hit/Damage bonuses on Action Point
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5296627" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yup, this is exactly right.</p><p></p><p>Read PHB page 270-271 which explain the different types of attacks. A melee attack or ranged attack can NEVER target more than one opponent, a close or area attack can target any number of opponents. So anything that applies to "the next attack" or somesuch when used with close/area WILL apply to all the attack rolls and there is NO ambiguity whatsoever in the rules on that point. </p><p></p><p>The only ambiguity that can arise is with multi-attack melee powers if you decide to interpret 'attack' to mean 'attack power' instead of just taking it at face value. This seems to have been an issue for people writing official material, so you will find some stuff like Tactical Presence where it seems like they could have meant either one. If you are going to go by the rules sensu stricto then attack means 'attack' not 'attack power' and notice that the FAQ entry is based on exactly this. You'll always be on safe ground by RAW doing that, though there are certain powers which may not work as they seem to be intended (and at least one feat).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5296627, member: 82106"] Yup, this is exactly right. Read PHB page 270-271 which explain the different types of attacks. A melee attack or ranged attack can NEVER target more than one opponent, a close or area attack can target any number of opponents. So anything that applies to "the next attack" or somesuch when used with close/area WILL apply to all the attack rolls and there is NO ambiguity whatsoever in the rules on that point. The only ambiguity that can arise is with multi-attack melee powers if you decide to interpret 'attack' to mean 'attack power' instead of just taking it at face value. This seems to have been an issue for people writing official material, so you will find some stuff like Tactical Presence where it seems like they could have meant either one. If you are going to go by the rules sensu stricto then attack means 'attack' not 'attack power' and notice that the FAQ entry is based on exactly this. You'll always be on safe ground by RAW doing that, though there are certain powers which may not work as they seem to be intended (and at least one feat). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stacking To Hit/Damage bonuses on Action Point
Top