Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stacking Tomes and Manuals
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FANGO" data-source="post: 26498" data-attributes="member: 2368"><p><strong>Whoa...</strong></p><p></p><p>Okay, people seem to baking this a little too far ;-)</p><p></p><p>Here's how I think it ought to be....</p><p></p><p>First of all, it is stated clearly that inherent bonuses cap at +5, so you don't need to worry about someone stacking up on a +2, a +4, and a +1 and ending up with a +7 bonus. Since the cap is there regardless, and the progression in the cost of the books/wish spells/scrolls/whatever is linear, I see no reason not to let them stack (and this is how we do it in my group, too) up to a max of +5. Also, the bonus granted is only partially magical, since it requires a certain amount of study and such...so I figure that the bonus should be noted as an increase in the base stat (ex: I use the 'temporary score' section to note pluses from items such as headbands of intellect, and I simply add the inherent bonus onto the 'ability score' section of the character sheet, since it's not really actively being caused by any magic item or anything). So poison and such should be able to take those points away, I would say (although I'm not sure about other magic items, now that it's been brought up....regardless, we've never needed to worry about that in my group, and nobody has ever really had to endure so much ability damage as to disable them).</p><p></p><p>Anyway, to recap...</p><p>bonuses should stack, up to +5</p><p>bonuses from the books and such are less magical (in that they are permanent and not actively caused by items) than other magical stat gains, and as such should be treated a little differently (esp. since they cost FIVE THOUSAND exp per +1...xp costs are nasty!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FANGO, post: 26498, member: 2368"] [b]Whoa...[/b] Okay, people seem to baking this a little too far ;-) Here's how I think it ought to be.... First of all, it is stated clearly that inherent bonuses cap at +5, so you don't need to worry about someone stacking up on a +2, a +4, and a +1 and ending up with a +7 bonus. Since the cap is there regardless, and the progression in the cost of the books/wish spells/scrolls/whatever is linear, I see no reason not to let them stack (and this is how we do it in my group, too) up to a max of +5. Also, the bonus granted is only partially magical, since it requires a certain amount of study and such...so I figure that the bonus should be noted as an increase in the base stat (ex: I use the 'temporary score' section to note pluses from items such as headbands of intellect, and I simply add the inherent bonus onto the 'ability score' section of the character sheet, since it's not really actively being caused by any magic item or anything). So poison and such should be able to take those points away, I would say (although I'm not sure about other magic items, now that it's been brought up....regardless, we've never needed to worry about that in my group, and nobody has ever really had to endure so much ability damage as to disable them). Anyway, to recap... bonuses should stack, up to +5 bonuses from the books and such are less magical (in that they are permanent and not actively caused by items) than other magical stat gains, and as such should be treated a little differently (esp. since they cost FIVE THOUSAND exp per +1...xp costs are nasty!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stacking Tomes and Manuals
Top