Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Staggered condition and Ray of Dizziness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Werebat" data-source="post: 5290045" data-attributes="member: 40158"><p>I know I'm mixing game systems here, but it's surely not an uncommon mix, so here goes...</p><p></p><p>Spell Compendium has a spell called Ray of Dizziness that is a ranged touch attack with no save. The staggered condition didn't exist in 3.5 but Ray of Dizziness produced effects identical to the staggered condition.</p><p></p><p>One of the reasons some players loved RoD (when they were the ones using it) is that it was a save-or-suck spell that didn't allow a saving throw (presumably on the pretext that the ranged touch attack "could" miss its target). Thus it was considered a grand spell to use on easy-to-touch big bads like dragons.</p><p></p><p>Also, since it didn't technically inflict an "condition" on its target, there was no real way to get rid of it other than waiting the spell out. Heal didn't remove it because it wasn't a condition. Any other spell with a list of conditions that it removed didn't do so either because it wasn't on that list.</p><p></p><p>Pathfinder does have the staggered condition and it a player wanted to use RoD in a pathfinder game where SC was allowed, it would seem reasonable to say that it inflicted the staggered condition on those affected by it. However, a quick look through the books reveals that while PF created the staggered condition it didn't seem to acknowledge it anywhere. Thus, no creature types are immune to being staggered (not even undead or constructs). Spells that remove lists of conditions don't seem to mention the staggered condition. Therefore, making RoD inflict the staggered condition in PF doesn't seem to alter the spell's powergaming juiciness much, which is irritating for this DM who thinks the spell is a bit OP.</p><p></p><p>Any suggestions? Am I missing something? What creature types should be immune to staggering? What spells should remove the condition? Are there any other ranged touch attack spells in PF with the same "you-get-no-save-and-you-suck" mechanism, and how do they work? I'm thinking a save every round might be appropriate, but what kind?</p><p></p><p>Or maybe RoD allows a caster to make a ranged touch attack every round for the spell duration, which staggers its target for a round if it hits?</p><p></p><p>???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Werebat, post: 5290045, member: 40158"] I know I'm mixing game systems here, but it's surely not an uncommon mix, so here goes... Spell Compendium has a spell called Ray of Dizziness that is a ranged touch attack with no save. The staggered condition didn't exist in 3.5 but Ray of Dizziness produced effects identical to the staggered condition. One of the reasons some players loved RoD (when they were the ones using it) is that it was a save-or-suck spell that didn't allow a saving throw (presumably on the pretext that the ranged touch attack "could" miss its target). Thus it was considered a grand spell to use on easy-to-touch big bads like dragons. Also, since it didn't technically inflict an "condition" on its target, there was no real way to get rid of it other than waiting the spell out. Heal didn't remove it because it wasn't a condition. Any other spell with a list of conditions that it removed didn't do so either because it wasn't on that list. Pathfinder does have the staggered condition and it a player wanted to use RoD in a pathfinder game where SC was allowed, it would seem reasonable to say that it inflicted the staggered condition on those affected by it. However, a quick look through the books reveals that while PF created the staggered condition it didn't seem to acknowledge it anywhere. Thus, no creature types are immune to being staggered (not even undead or constructs). Spells that remove lists of conditions don't seem to mention the staggered condition. Therefore, making RoD inflict the staggered condition in PF doesn't seem to alter the spell's powergaming juiciness much, which is irritating for this DM who thinks the spell is a bit OP. Any suggestions? Am I missing something? What creature types should be immune to staggering? What spells should remove the condition? Are there any other ranged touch attack spells in PF with the same "you-get-no-save-and-you-suck" mechanism, and how do they work? I'm thinking a save every round might be appropriate, but what kind? Or maybe RoD allows a caster to make a ranged touch attack every round for the spell duration, which staggers its target for a round if it hits? ??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Staggered condition and Ray of Dizziness
Top