Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 4461944" data-attributes="member: 16285">Why not? I mean you are worried about his ability to role-play his character according to the BoED's guidance on "good" and yet if you dictate how his character needs to act you have removed his "ownership" of the character. IMO this is the wrong way to go.What you are doing is dictating how the character should be played instead of working with the player to ensure that the PC fits the game.When I said have him write his own code of conduct - I did not mean that you didn't have input and approval. That is essential - by working together it promotes a better gaming environment instead of dictating to the player.Nope. If it was then there would be no reason to have Bluff bonuses to favored enemy interactions would there? In other words if that is what they meant then they wouldn't have bothered included Bluff bonuses in the benefits. There are more guidelines in the BoED for how to treat prisoners, etc.  There is also some guidance on being neutral good (a prereq for the prestige class) and how an exalted ranger acts too.</blockquote>