Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stances, Tricks and Aspects working with At-Wills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mkill" data-source="post: 5756457" data-attributes="member: 55985"><p>Sorry to activate voice of reason mode here, but did you consider time vs. benefit here? How many players do you have? Five? How many of them want to play fighter/rogue/ranger? One? Two? How many of them want some classic/essentials hybrid? Zero? Maybe one?</p><p></p><p>The point I'm trying to make is that as GM, it's often not necessary to rewrite the rules. Sure, it's fun, but the time is better spend developing game world, plot, NPCs, monsters, encounters...</p><p></p><p>Giving essentials stances to a classic fighter could work... maybe. But that's something you can worry about if a player at your table asks for it. My take would be to allow it under the condition that it's tested for a session or two. If it doesn't work, the player has to rebuild his PC.</p><p></p><p>The question is why anybody would even want to use the at-will stances with a PHB fighter. Many of the at-wills they have are very good. On top, there are tons of ways for them to get at-will as MBA. And they can get really good stances with their utilities, encounters and dailies, which don't work with at-will stances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mkill, post: 5756457, member: 55985"] Sorry to activate voice of reason mode here, but did you consider time vs. benefit here? How many players do you have? Five? How many of them want to play fighter/rogue/ranger? One? Two? How many of them want some classic/essentials hybrid? Zero? Maybe one? The point I'm trying to make is that as GM, it's often not necessary to rewrite the rules. Sure, it's fun, but the time is better spend developing game world, plot, NPCs, monsters, encounters... Giving essentials stances to a classic fighter could work... maybe. But that's something you can worry about if a player at your table asks for it. My take would be to allow it under the condition that it's tested for a session or two. If it doesn't work, the player has to rebuild his PC. The question is why anybody would even want to use the at-will stances with a PHB fighter. Many of the at-wills they have are very good. On top, there are tons of ways for them to get at-will as MBA. And they can get really good stances with their utilities, encounters and dailies, which don't work with at-will stances. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stances, Tricks and Aspects working with At-Wills
Top