Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Essenti" data-source="post: 5824641" data-attributes="member: 100205">I'm not sure I see the relevancy of this comment. It's only as boring as the player using it makes it out to be. Taking a stance shouldn't be a full round action anyway, should it? You should be able to both make an attack and then assume a new stance on the same turn. Is taking a stance any more boring than, say:&nbsp;&quot;I swing my axe at it!&quot;&nbsp;Awesome. You go with your bad self. I told you the creature turned invisible...&nbsp;&quot;I swing my axe at it!&quot;&nbsp;In that situation, going into a defensive stance (or full defense, which is essentially a stance available to everyone) could be the more tactically sound thing to do. But it really is only as boring as the player describes it (or perhaps doesn't describe it).&nbsp;<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Essenti, post: 5824641, member: 100205"] I'm not sure I see the relevancy of this comment. It's only as boring as the player using it makes it out to be. Taking a stance shouldn't be a full round action anyway, should it? You should be able to both make an attack and then assume a new stance on the same turn. Is taking a stance any more boring than, say: "I swing my axe at it!" Awesome. You go with your bad self. I told you the creature turned invisible... "I swing my axe at it!" In that situation, going into a defensive stance (or full defense, which is essentially a stance available to everyone) could be the more tactically sound thing to do. But it really is only as boring as the player describes it (or perhaps doesn't describe it). :) [/QUOTE]

Verification