Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek and Idealism vs cynicism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ryujin" data-source="post: 9565700" data-attributes="member: 27897"><p>"Star Trek" needs to be idealistic and forward-looking, to be "Star Trek." We have more than enough dystopian and dark fiction out there. We need something to aspire to.</p><p></p><p>I started watching TOS in 1966. I was too young to really internalize the barely hidden messages in it, but they affected me anyway. My first exposure to the US Constitution, as a Canadian, was via "The Omega Glory." It set the tone, for me. A few years later, when I was busy spotting the mistakes and assumptions in "Chariots of the Gods", the irony of a Canadian telling Americans that their Declaration of Independence needs to be more than just words on a page finally struck me. <em>E Plebnista.</em></p><p></p><p>TOS was never about perfect people, in a perfect society. It was aspirational. Utopias can't exist because people are imperfect, so they can't maintain a perfect society. The Federation is a structure in which people can aspire to be better and actually get there. It shows us that we can aspire to be better, and be better, making society better as a result.</p><p></p><p>Several others have said it: The existence of Section 31, as a necessity to The Federation, makes all of that a lie. "You can be who you are because we do the dirty work, that you won't." The only way that Section 31 could have any value, in my Star Trek, is if it's shown to be an absolute bald-faced lie, perpetrated by power hungry people who can't get what they really want out of The Federation. They need to be rooted-out and expunged from existence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ryujin, post: 9565700, member: 27897"] "Star Trek" needs to be idealistic and forward-looking, to be "Star Trek." We have more than enough dystopian and dark fiction out there. We need something to aspire to. I started watching TOS in 1966. I was too young to really internalize the barely hidden messages in it, but they affected me anyway. My first exposure to the US Constitution, as a Canadian, was via "The Omega Glory." It set the tone, for me. A few years later, when I was busy spotting the mistakes and assumptions in "Chariots of the Gods", the irony of a Canadian telling Americans that their Declaration of Independence needs to be more than just words on a page finally struck me. [I]E Plebnista.[/I] TOS was never about perfect people, in a perfect society. It was aspirational. Utopias can't exist because people are imperfect, so they can't maintain a perfect society. The Federation is a structure in which people can aspire to be better and actually get there. It shows us that we can aspire to be better, and be better, making society better as a result. Several others have said it: The existence of Section 31, as a necessity to The Federation, makes all of that a lie. "You can be who you are because we do the dirty work, that you won't." The only way that Section 31 could have any value, in my Star Trek, is if it's shown to be an absolute bald-faced lie, perpetrated by power hungry people who can't get what they really want out of The Federation. They need to be rooted-out and expunged from existence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek and Idealism vs cynicism
Top