Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="payn" data-source="post: 9593872" data-attributes="member: 90374"><p>I've posted this a few times, but since we got a DS9 specific thread ill discuss it again. The fact that previous Trek shows were the galaxy through the Federation's eyes and that DS9 was actually the Federation through the galaxy's eyes. This reexamination was very interesting to me. It finally made the Trek world feel less curated and more real. A lot of folks disliked the show because it broke Trek-isms like one ship and crew, and Rodenberry's utopia optimism, but I think it wasn't either of those things. The real culprit was exceptionalism, particularly for an American audience. </p><p></p><p>In the original series, you had a diverse cast under a BAMF captain. They went around solving problems by the seat of their pants. As long as they followed diligently captain BAMF as he always knew what to do. Essentially, a hammer punch and/or lip lock resolved anything the universe could throw at them. TNG was a bit more nuanced. We now had a diverse ship of the absolute best minds of the Federation. They tended to solve problems more with their mind, but still you had this exceptional crew taming a violent and unreasonably wild yet endless supply of caricature aliens filled galaxy. </p><p></p><p>Then, you have DS9. The Federation is sent into a backwater system to play neutral party to a formerly occupied species and their captors. Neither of which wants them there. The station systems are not reliable, the species not satiated or defeated easily overnight, but problems that adapt and change over the entire series run. A lot of this had to do with the rise of serial television over episodic, but at the same time Trek was breaking a mold and moving into telling more nuanced story telling. The moraly grey aspects often appeared to chafe the utopia Gene set up, but I think it goes well beyond that in expectation of an exceptional crew blowing through a straw galaxy. YMMV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="payn, post: 9593872, member: 90374"] I've posted this a few times, but since we got a DS9 specific thread ill discuss it again. The fact that previous Trek shows were the galaxy through the Federation's eyes and that DS9 was actually the Federation through the galaxy's eyes. This reexamination was very interesting to me. It finally made the Trek world feel less curated and more real. A lot of folks disliked the show because it broke Trek-isms like one ship and crew, and Rodenberry's utopia optimism, but I think it wasn't either of those things. The real culprit was exceptionalism, particularly for an American audience. In the original series, you had a diverse cast under a BAMF captain. They went around solving problems by the seat of their pants. As long as they followed diligently captain BAMF as he always knew what to do. Essentially, a hammer punch and/or lip lock resolved anything the universe could throw at them. TNG was a bit more nuanced. We now had a diverse ship of the absolute best minds of the Federation. They tended to solve problems more with their mind, but still you had this exceptional crew taming a violent and unreasonably wild yet endless supply of caricature aliens filled galaxy. Then, you have DS9. The Federation is sent into a backwater system to play neutral party to a formerly occupied species and their captors. Neither of which wants them there. The station systems are not reliable, the species not satiated or defeated easily overnight, but problems that adapt and change over the entire series run. A lot of this had to do with the rise of serial television over episodic, but at the same time Trek was breaking a mold and moving into telling more nuanced story telling. The moraly grey aspects often appeared to chafe the utopia Gene set up, but I think it goes well beyond that in expectation of an exceptional crew blowing through a straw galaxy. YMMV. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Top