Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jian" data-source="post: 9713312" data-attributes="member: 78087"><p><strong>Inquisition</strong>, on the other hand, has aged less well, I think. It's still a well-executed episode and the beginning of the Section 31 arc. I don't disagree that the Federation needs an intelligence service (and they already have one) but I don't see why they need a super-secret intelligence service that everyone pretends doesn't exist (but I presume anyone in the know does know that they exist) and which clearly takes such cynical glee in being allowed to break the rules and dress in black pleather Gestapo uniforms. As more familiar as we are these days with authoritarianism, I think I'm inclined to say that Section 31 is a terrible idea and should be flushed out of an airlock at the earliest opportunity.</p><p></p><p>(And to be fair, the narrative is pretty clear that anyone sane in Starfleet does think this and the story does end badly for Sloan and his ilk, but where vibes are concerned the writers are splitting the difference, with some love for the "hard men making hard decisions" approach on display. It's an interesting Watson/Doyle split.)</p><p></p><p>(It also makes it a bit clearer to me why the recent TOS-era Section 31 movie took the approach it did, because the only way an ethical Federation can tolerate the existence of Section 31 is to have them be broken mavericks who send themselves off on suicide missions you couldn't order any Starfleet officer to do, and so they're more Guardians of the Galaxy than SS.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jian, post: 9713312, member: 78087"] [B]Inquisition[/B], on the other hand, has aged less well, I think. It's still a well-executed episode and the beginning of the Section 31 arc. I don't disagree that the Federation needs an intelligence service (and they already have one) but I don't see why they need a super-secret intelligence service that everyone pretends doesn't exist (but I presume anyone in the know does know that they exist) and which clearly takes such cynical glee in being allowed to break the rules and dress in black pleather Gestapo uniforms. As more familiar as we are these days with authoritarianism, I think I'm inclined to say that Section 31 is a terrible idea and should be flushed out of an airlock at the earliest opportunity. (And to be fair, the narrative is pretty clear that anyone sane in Starfleet does think this and the story does end badly for Sloan and his ilk, but where vibes are concerned the writers are splitting the difference, with some love for the "hard men making hard decisions" approach on display. It's an interesting Watson/Doyle split.) (It also makes it a bit clearer to me why the recent TOS-era Section 31 movie took the approach it did, because the only way an ethical Federation can tolerate the existence of Section 31 is to have them be broken mavericks who send themselves off on suicide missions you couldn't order any Starfleet officer to do, and so they're more Guardians of the Galaxy than SS.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
Top