Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek Federation Ships Achilles Heel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneLigon" data-source="post: 3420822" data-attributes="member: 3649"><p>In the original series, transporter tech wasn't nearly as precise as it was in later shows. It was horrifically dangerous to transport things from inside the ship to inside the ship, so dangerous that they only did it once. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They do have a transporter pattern for everyone. That's how the transporter works. It effectively kills you, then reconstructs you at the other end. That's why McCoy hated the thing. And they do use it like that in at least two OS shows I can think of. I always got the idea that they didn't really <em>know </em> all the ins and outs of the transporter. The 'show' reason why it existed was to keep them from having to do shots of the ship landing and taking off (some of the original designs would have allowed that); it was too expensive.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>One of the most amusing things in the first movie was where the captains chair arms fold in to keep him in his seat, just because people kept harping on that point <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I think the main point was that if the shields went down, you were screwed no matter where you put the bridge. So you might as well put it on the part of the ship that can <em>detach </em> (as far as I know, they do this once and once only in any of the series) and up top so in case you have to crash land, it'll be the last thing to be destroyed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneLigon, post: 3420822, member: 3649"] In the original series, transporter tech wasn't nearly as precise as it was in later shows. It was horrifically dangerous to transport things from inside the ship to inside the ship, so dangerous that they only did it once. They do have a transporter pattern for everyone. That's how the transporter works. It effectively kills you, then reconstructs you at the other end. That's why McCoy hated the thing. And they do use it like that in at least two OS shows I can think of. I always got the idea that they didn't really [I]know [/I] all the ins and outs of the transporter. The 'show' reason why it existed was to keep them from having to do shots of the ship landing and taking off (some of the original designs would have allowed that); it was too expensive. One of the most amusing things in the first movie was where the captains chair arms fold in to keep him in his seat, just because people kept harping on that point :) I think the main point was that if the shields went down, you were screwed no matter where you put the bridge. So you might as well put it on the part of the ship that can [I]detach [/I] (as far as I know, they do this once and once only in any of the series) and up top so in case you have to crash land, it'll be the last thing to be destroyed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek Federation Ships Achilles Heel
Top