Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek Next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 6224201" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>This is true. However, an explanation meant for fans hardly changed the nature of the show in the eyes of non-fans. And frankly, now there have been numerous other films and TV shows where we had aliens as humans in makeup. In the '60's, it was necessitated by cost and technology. Now it isn't. However, the humanity of Trek's aliens is also part of its appeal.</p><p></p><p>It's a complex problem. In the JJ Abrams movies, alien makeup is generally in the background and played for laughs. I don't know what mix of humans, makeup, and CGI would be appropriate (and affordable) for a TV show.</p><p></p><p>That's true. It's a high bar though. The original Trek really captured people's imaginations with its speculative vision of the future. Recapturing them with a new vision that is equally speculative, but also equally gripping (and eerily accurate, in some cases) is a high bar. Roddenberry was a visionary, and it would take another equally special person to revitalize the franchise (no offense, JJ).</p><p></p><p>Also, there's a question of what out of the existing technology will we as an audience let them get away with. Numerous books have now been written about how warp drive, transportation, replication, etc. are physically impossible. Is the more informed audience of the 21st century still ok with those things? What about the rampant goalpost shifting wherein technological capabilities are redefined as needed for the plot? In the reboot, you can now beam on to moving ships light years away and warp from Earth to Vulcan within minutes, and to Qo'nos within hours. Those kinds of things could mess up a TV series.</p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p>It's hard to pull off.</p><p></p><p>It can be, but I'm not holding my breath. It will require not only a game-changing new personality to provide a creative vision, but also a network who will take it on, and a great deal of behind the scenes wrangling. Then it'll require the same things that every other TV series does: a good team, a lot of hard work, and good timing.</p><p></p><p>I hope people try, but I think there's a lot more ways it could go wrong than go right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 6224201, member: 17106"] This is true. However, an explanation meant for fans hardly changed the nature of the show in the eyes of non-fans. And frankly, now there have been numerous other films and TV shows where we had aliens as humans in makeup. In the '60's, it was necessitated by cost and technology. Now it isn't. However, the humanity of Trek's aliens is also part of its appeal. It's a complex problem. In the JJ Abrams movies, alien makeup is generally in the background and played for laughs. I don't know what mix of humans, makeup, and CGI would be appropriate (and affordable) for a TV show. That's true. It's a high bar though. The original Trek really captured people's imaginations with its speculative vision of the future. Recapturing them with a new vision that is equally speculative, but also equally gripping (and eerily accurate, in some cases) is a high bar. Roddenberry was a visionary, and it would take another equally special person to revitalize the franchise (no offense, JJ). Also, there's a question of what out of the existing technology will we as an audience let them get away with. Numerous books have now been written about how warp drive, transportation, replication, etc. are physically impossible. Is the more informed audience of the 21st century still ok with those things? What about the rampant goalpost shifting wherein technological capabilities are redefined as needed for the plot? In the reboot, you can now beam on to moving ships light years away and warp from Earth to Vulcan within minutes, and to Qo'nos within hours. Those kinds of things could mess up a TV series. Agreed. It's hard to pull off. It can be, but I'm not holding my breath. It will require not only a game-changing new personality to provide a creative vision, but also a network who will take it on, and a great deal of behind the scenes wrangling. Then it'll require the same things that every other TV series does: a good team, a lot of hard work, and good timing. I hope people try, but I think there's a lot more ways it could go wrong than go right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek Next?
Top