Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds - Season 3 Viewing (Spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9725505" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I mean, and Christ this episode using the transporter to isolate this thing kind of opened up the possibility of using the transporters against anyone doing anything malign on the ship. Boarding party? Transporter buffer. Monster loose on the cargo deck? Transporter buffer? Captain possessed by an alien entity? Transporter buffer.</p><p></p><p>I think it's a solvable problem and some TNG/VOY stuff did address this by implying the transporter buffer was in some way very limited. Here perhaps what Scotty did was only possible (despite it being like two keypresses) because he prepared to do it beforehand, or because the confinement device was in exactly the right place at the right time, so I can let it go because they did the smart thing and <em>didn't</em> explain exactly why that was possible here (often in SF, written or in movies/TV it's better to remain silent about how exactly something works and let your audience imagine why a solution might be limited than to explain in detail and open up a million plot holes/examples of how you don't understand basic science - I'm looking at you Rebecca Chambers!).</p><p></p><p>Also at least Scotty specifically did it, who TNG had established a true master of messing the transporter buffers (c.f. the TNG episode "Relics").</p><p></p><p>(PS really like this Scotty actor - he's perfect - better than the original (imho) and incomparably superior to Simon Pegg, who god love him, might as well have been a mildly talented Trek cosplayer they picked up at a random SF con in his portrayal of Scotty.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Whilst he surprisingly doesn't seem to have commented on it, yeah I'm pretty certain that's the main reason, because he is a serious Trek head (i.e. knows a lot of weird lore, thinks about the setting in his spare time, etc.) in the way RTD is a serious Doctor Who head (and to a lesser extent the other two showrunners of nuWho). It makes drama a huge amount easier to create when you don't have transporters, and avoids you having to incredibly carefully delimit what transporters can do. It's commonly claimed the only reason TOS had transporters was because it was a lot easier for the budget than showing shuttles taking off/landing/being in place on the planet and so on (something which is trivial next to other SFX costs today).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9725505, member: 18"] I mean, and Christ this episode using the transporter to isolate this thing kind of opened up the possibility of using the transporters against anyone doing anything malign on the ship. Boarding party? Transporter buffer. Monster loose on the cargo deck? Transporter buffer? Captain possessed by an alien entity? Transporter buffer. I think it's a solvable problem and some TNG/VOY stuff did address this by implying the transporter buffer was in some way very limited. Here perhaps what Scotty did was only possible (despite it being like two keypresses) because he prepared to do it beforehand, or because the confinement device was in exactly the right place at the right time, so I can let it go because they did the smart thing and [I]didn't[/I] explain exactly why that was possible here (often in SF, written or in movies/TV it's better to remain silent about how exactly something works and let your audience imagine why a solution might be limited than to explain in detail and open up a million plot holes/examples of how you don't understand basic science - I'm looking at you Rebecca Chambers!). Also at least Scotty specifically did it, who TNG had established a true master of messing the transporter buffers (c.f. the TNG episode "Relics"). (PS really like this Scotty actor - he's perfect - better than the original (imho) and incomparably superior to Simon Pegg, who god love him, might as well have been a mildly talented Trek cosplayer they picked up at a random SF con in his portrayal of Scotty.) Whilst he surprisingly doesn't seem to have commented on it, yeah I'm pretty certain that's the main reason, because he is a serious Trek head (i.e. knows a lot of weird lore, thinks about the setting in his spare time, etc.) in the way RTD is a serious Doctor Who head (and to a lesser extent the other two showrunners of nuWho). It makes drama a huge amount easier to create when you don't have transporters, and avoids you having to incredibly carefully delimit what transporters can do. It's commonly claimed the only reason TOS had transporters was because it was a lot easier for the budget than showing shuttles taking off/landing/being in place on the planet and so on (something which is trivial next to other SFX costs today). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds - Season 3 Viewing (Spoilers)
Top