Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Flexor the Mighty!" data-source="post: 1668976" data-attributes="member: 1013">When I read about this show I had visions of &quot;low tech&quot; space travel with a more of a submarine feel than an Enterprise-D feel, which is what we got IMO.&nbsp;&nbsp; More of a missle based combat instead of &quot;phase canons&quot; which are just phasers.&nbsp; No viewscreens and low tech communications and sensors compared to the later shows, I do like how they don't use transporters very much, and plenty of stories that draws off the background of given in the other shows.&nbsp; Instead I got more Star Trek as usual.&nbsp; And it wasn't even well written.&nbsp; &nbsp;I love TOS, liked DS9 &amp; TNG, was apathetic about Voyager...but I don't care in the least for what has been done with Enterprise.&nbsp;&nbsp; I know I was dissapointed that I didnt' get to see the history of the other shows in action, but I would have kept watching it if it had been interesting.&nbsp; It wasn't even that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Flexor the Mighty!, post: 1668976, member: 1013"] When I read about this show I had visions of "low tech" space travel with a more of a submarine feel than an Enterprise-D feel, which is what we got IMO. More of a missle based combat instead of "phase canons" which are just phasers. No viewscreens and low tech communications and sensors compared to the later shows, I do like how they don't use transporters very much, and plenty of stories that draws off the background of given in the other shows. Instead I got more Star Trek as usual. And it wasn't even well written. I love TOS, liked DS9 & TNG, was apathetic about Voyager...but I don't care in the least for what has been done with Enterprise. I know I was dissapointed that I didnt' get to see the history of the other shows in action, but I would have kept watching it if it had been interesting. It wasn't even that. [/QUOTE]

Verification