Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Orius" data-source="post: 1488555" data-attributes="member: 8863">Errg, I'd confused this with another thread.&nbsp; But I have to say, that alteration looks pretty good actually.&nbsp; Just compare the two.&nbsp; The original may have been impressive in 1980, but it does look pretty bad now.&nbsp; Also, there's the matter of better holograms appearing in the prequels trilogy, while this one chronologically takes place later.The article said that the Jabba CGI in Star Wars SE will be redone using the TPM Jabba as a guide.&nbsp; That sounds good too, the SE Jabba looked horrible, but the TPM Jabba was done fairly well, IMO.And sure, let's get rid of that Greedo shoots first crap.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :P"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Orius, post: 1488555, member: 8863"] Errg, I'd confused this with another thread. But I have to say, that alteration looks pretty good actually. Just compare the two. The original may have been impressive in 1980, but it does look pretty bad now. Also, there's the matter of better holograms appearing in the prequels trilogy, while this one chronologically takes place later. The article said that the Jabba CGI in [i]Star Wars[/i] SE will be redone using the TPM Jabba as a guide. That sounds good too, the SE Jabba looked horrible, but the TPM Jabba was done fairly well, IMO. And sure, let's get rid of that Greedo shoots first crap. :P [/QUOTE]

Verification