Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Wars Rewatch
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9643796" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>I mean, that's fine as a personal opinion, but I'm talking from a "success of the setting/brand/IP" perspective, rather than a "lol [insert thing] sux haha" kind of one.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't make sense to make a massive time-jump when there's absolutely nothing about the sequels and their ending which would require that. If they'd ended with the galaxy either being made perfect and safe for at least decades with President-for-life Rey, or civilization across much of the galaxy being basically destroyed or something, that'd make sense/be needed. As is, very little was locked down by TRoS (one of the few positive aspects of the movie). The returned Palpatine and his hard-to-explain fleet were destroyed, and the First Order scattered or destroyed (like the Empire before them). Almost everything else is up in the air.</p><p></p><p>Developing a new aesthetic, new ships, and a new history and so on for 100 years on is going to be a lot more time-consuming and expensive than just going 5 years, where modern X-Wings could still plausibly be in service and so on. Going 100 years also means you're taking a big risk, because if you deviate too far design-wise the audience could be put off by that. And whatever you might think, there are probably a lot of younger people out there who actually like some/all of the sequel characters, so there's potential for re-using them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9643796, member: 18"] I mean, that's fine as a personal opinion, but I'm talking from a "success of the setting/brand/IP" perspective, rather than a "lol [insert thing] sux haha" kind of one. It doesn't make sense to make a massive time-jump when there's absolutely nothing about the sequels and their ending which would require that. If they'd ended with the galaxy either being made perfect and safe for at least decades with President-for-life Rey, or civilization across much of the galaxy being basically destroyed or something, that'd make sense/be needed. As is, very little was locked down by TRoS (one of the few positive aspects of the movie). The returned Palpatine and his hard-to-explain fleet were destroyed, and the First Order scattered or destroyed (like the Empire before them). Almost everything else is up in the air. Developing a new aesthetic, new ships, and a new history and so on for 100 years on is going to be a lot more time-consuming and expensive than just going 5 years, where modern X-Wings could still plausibly be in service and so on. Going 100 years also means you're taking a big risk, because if you deviate too far design-wise the audience could be put off by that. And whatever you might think, there are probably a lot of younger people out there who actually like some/all of the sequel characters, so there's potential for re-using them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Star Wars Rewatch
Top