Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Star Wars Saga/D&D 5th Hybrid [OOC/Rolls]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Forged Fury" data-source="post: 6864542" data-attributes="member: 95059"><p>Well, Taking 10 was a thing in 3.5 and most people seemed okay with it. I'm fine with it, less chance of RNG causing a relatively highly skilled character from missing an average DC. I think it makes even more sense in 5E where bounded accuracy generally caps a lot of checks to +11 or so for max stat, 20th level characters unaided by magic or Expertise. With that said, I'm not sure if it is appropriate for an opposed test, at least for the "offensive" side of the opposed check. Specifically with stealth, unless the one perceiving is actively maintaining guard, I usually just use their Passive Perception as a DC, modified as appropriate. So, in the case where they may have disadvantage due to loud noises or other distractions, it would be Passive Perception -5. </p><p></p><p>I think bonuses/penalties should be applied to the test they actually impact. For instance, loud noises don't necessarily make it easier for one to walk more quietly, but they do impact the ability of an opponent to hear, so penalty to the Perception check. Walking around in soft slippers instead of regular shoes, however, make it more easy to move silently, so bonus to the Stealth check. At least, that's how I rule it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Forged Fury, post: 6864542, member: 95059"] Well, Taking 10 was a thing in 3.5 and most people seemed okay with it. I'm fine with it, less chance of RNG causing a relatively highly skilled character from missing an average DC. I think it makes even more sense in 5E where bounded accuracy generally caps a lot of checks to +11 or so for max stat, 20th level characters unaided by magic or Expertise. With that said, I'm not sure if it is appropriate for an opposed test, at least for the "offensive" side of the opposed check. Specifically with stealth, unless the one perceiving is actively maintaining guard, I usually just use their Passive Perception as a DC, modified as appropriate. So, in the case where they may have disadvantage due to loud noises or other distractions, it would be Passive Perception -5. I think bonuses/penalties should be applied to the test they actually impact. For instance, loud noises don't necessarily make it easier for one to walk more quietly, but they do impact the ability of an opponent to hear, so penalty to the Perception check. Walking around in soft slippers instead of regular shoes, however, make it more easy to move silently, so bonus to the Stealth check. At least, that's how I rule it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
Star Wars Saga/D&D 5th Hybrid [OOC/Rolls]
Top