Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Binder Fred" data-source="post: 6941896" data-attributes="member: 63746">We are going in circles.   [MENTION=6792106]Sezarious[/MENTION]: Uthall moved 2m at 90 degrees to the tunnel entrance, so tossing the explosives further in than the entrance means he would get cover from the explosion.   [MENTION=6801242]GreenKarl[/MENTION]: requiring metric precision when using theatre-of-the-mind is not a workable proposition, IMHO. Metric precision and tactics requires a tactical map and a different sort of gaming than what we've been doing so far. I would personnaly shy away from that sort thing anyway - as well as the excessive adherence to the rules-as-written this turn seems to be suffering from - as I find it less enjoyable than the cinematic, rule-of-cool approach.In this specific case, Uhtall is 8m from the gand and Kacela. Uthall is also at least 3 or 4m from where Jiahana is tossing the explosives (the 2m he moved¨+ half the width of the tunnel -- heck, potentially the full width of the tunnel minus a foot if we want to micro-manage it all the way). I suggest we rule that Kacela and the Gand are outside the 8m blast radius and proceed from there. If not, then the gand specifically said he/she would move them both back out of the expected blast radius (post #476), so it's a non-issue as far as the blast is concerned. Let us know which it is (in or out), and let's proceed from there.   [MENTION=4936]Shayuri[/MENTION]: I'd suggest a force disarm on Uthall, followed by moving into melee range? He's got no melee weapon even if the Disarm fails, so he'll be at a Disadvantage.</blockquote>

Verification