Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 3445586" data-attributes="member: 158">Though it behoofs you to correct me, cud you keep it udderly germane to the thread, rather than milking my mistake for what it's worth? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Seriously, I don't know where the heck THAT slip-up came from... "Secret Cow?" Sheesh! I need to have my herd examined...As for the skill system issue that dominates the current discussion, I really don't see much problem, because I've never seen Star Wars, OR D&D characters, as representing real life very much; they more represent the dramatic and cinematic characters of movies and Pulp Fiction, characters who didn't worry so much about how well they could tie rope, so much as what their fields of specialty were. Usually the ones who attempted something outside their fields still succeeded, having "gotten lucky" at whatever they were attempting instead. An adventuring type who traipses around rescuing, swashbuckling, exploring, etc. will have a wide range of background skills, and will eventually look like such a character, whether by skill point allocations or by this new method, if they want to look like such a plausible "cinematic" character.</blockquote>