Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Star Wars Saga Edition [SECR] Preview #8 is Up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jonrog1" data-source="post: 3551405" data-attributes="member: 189"><p>Right, sorry for the delay.</p><p></p><p>99% of players in classic MSRD rules, when they "grapple" somebody, all they want to do is grab them. Stop them from moving, interfere with them in some way. Then the player wades through all the bloody options in the definition ... <em>(the paralysing effect of too many choice, btw, has been well-documented)</em> Only we grappling PC freaks really take the maneuver to town with our improved Grapple feats, etc. Same with Trip. When's the last time you saw somebody use Trip who wasn't decked out with the fun feats around it?</p><p></p><p>So they stripped it down. "Grab" is a standard action. -5 on the unarmed attack roll vs. Reflex DC, up to one size larger and one opponent at a time. It deals no damage. The -5, I assume because you're not just trying to hit a guy, but hit him somewhere -- arm, shoulder, waist -- where you can gain purchase. I am cool with that.</p><p></p><p>A "grabbed" opponent is at -2 for attacks (except w/natural and light melee weapons) , and can't move. You can take a standard action to break a grab automatically. That clears one grabber per character level. (So a heroic soldier can shake off the mooks trying to pin him down)</p><p></p><p>So when you grab somebody, they have a choice -- fight you, or stand there and try to keep shooting while you wrestle with them. (NOTE: I'd probably houserule that you can move the two of you around 1 square with an opposed STR check. I don't think you have to have somebody pinned to move them.) </p><p></p><p>A "Grapple" on the other hand, is essentially an improved Grab. You can <em>only do it if you have the Pin or Trip feat or both.</em> It's an unarmed attack (without the -5 penalty, so there's your Imp Grapple feat from the old rules, built in) that does no damage.</p><p></p><p>As soon as that attack's successful, make an opposed Grapple Check, with Grapple being:</p><p></p><p>d20+ BAB + (STR/DEX, pick higher) + special size modifier</p><p></p><p>If you win the Grapple check the result is dependent on your PC's chain of feats. That is, if you have <strong>Pin</strong>, the character's automatically pinned (no actions, lose Dex). Grapple every round to renew the pin. If you have Pin and <strong>Crush</strong>, you can choose to do unarmed damage at the same time as the Pin resolves. <strong>Trip feat</strong>: win the Grapple, your opponent's prone. <strong>Throw</strong> feat: the character's prone <em>over there</em> and takes unarmed damage. Essentially you're building a combat effect through a feat chain. </p><p></p><p>Or, when you win the Grapple check, you do damage with an unarmed strikes or light weapon.</p><p></p><p>Unless I'm misreading, if you're grappled and you don't have those feats, all you can do is make Grapple checks to try to get away. If you're subject to a Pin, I don't think you can use the Grapple check for unarmed/light weapon damage, since the feat explicitly says "may take no actions." And seeing as you're only Grappled by somebody who <em>has</em> the Pin feat -- you know what you can do and can't do. Automatically.</p><p></p><p>Now some people will freak, feeling options have been taken away from the character. I respect that, but disagree. I think close-up fighting is specialized enough that simulating it with some training is legitimate. I LIKE the idea that there's a difference between Schmuck A grabbing you, wrestling with you while you whack at him with your gun butt, and being able to put an opponent in a submission hold. As soon as you see a specialized grappling character, you know you are in for a world of hurt and had best stay out of arm's reach. At the same time, a specialized Grappling PC has a big advantage over untrained opponents, and won't take many feats before he's tossing Stormtroopers around like ragdolls or crushing their throats. Bull (Bantha, whatever) Rush has been similarly transformed into a feat -- not linked to Grapple, but same theory of design.</p><p></p><p>If you disagree, you can of course simply use the rules as stated in the feats Bantha Rush, Pin and Trip as combat choices, and leave Crush and Throw as feats. But this is one of those things I read and went "huh"?, and then on reflection realized I liked in the balance. You Grapple with clear intent now. And regardless, I love linking Trip to the Grapple roll. Tying previously separate maneuvers with separate rules to one game mechanic always pleases me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jonrog1, post: 3551405, member: 189"] Right, sorry for the delay. 99% of players in classic MSRD rules, when they "grapple" somebody, all they want to do is grab them. Stop them from moving, interfere with them in some way. Then the player wades through all the bloody options in the definition ... [I](the paralysing effect of too many choice, btw, has been well-documented)[/I] Only we grappling PC freaks really take the maneuver to town with our improved Grapple feats, etc. Same with Trip. When's the last time you saw somebody use Trip who wasn't decked out with the fun feats around it? So they stripped it down. "Grab" is a standard action. -5 on the unarmed attack roll vs. Reflex DC, up to one size larger and one opponent at a time. It deals no damage. The -5, I assume because you're not just trying to hit a guy, but hit him somewhere -- arm, shoulder, waist -- where you can gain purchase. I am cool with that. A "grabbed" opponent is at -2 for attacks (except w/natural and light melee weapons) , and can't move. You can take a standard action to break a grab automatically. That clears one grabber per character level. (So a heroic soldier can shake off the mooks trying to pin him down) So when you grab somebody, they have a choice -- fight you, or stand there and try to keep shooting while you wrestle with them. (NOTE: I'd probably houserule that you can move the two of you around 1 square with an opposed STR check. I don't think you have to have somebody pinned to move them.) A "Grapple" on the other hand, is essentially an improved Grab. You can [I]only do it if you have the Pin or Trip feat or both.[/I] It's an unarmed attack (without the -5 penalty, so there's your Imp Grapple feat from the old rules, built in) that does no damage. As soon as that attack's successful, make an opposed Grapple Check, with Grapple being: d20+ BAB + (STR/DEX, pick higher) + special size modifier If you win the Grapple check the result is dependent on your PC's chain of feats. That is, if you have [B]Pin[/B], the character's automatically pinned (no actions, lose Dex). Grapple every round to renew the pin. If you have Pin and [B]Crush[/B], you can choose to do unarmed damage at the same time as the Pin resolves. [B]Trip feat[/B]: win the Grapple, your opponent's prone. [B]Throw[/B] feat: the character's prone [I]over there[/I] and takes unarmed damage. Essentially you're building a combat effect through a feat chain. Or, when you win the Grapple check, you do damage with an unarmed strikes or light weapon. Unless I'm misreading, if you're grappled and you don't have those feats, all you can do is make Grapple checks to try to get away. If you're subject to a Pin, I don't think you can use the Grapple check for unarmed/light weapon damage, since the feat explicitly says "may take no actions." And seeing as you're only Grappled by somebody who [I]has[/I] the Pin feat -- you know what you can do and can't do. Automatically. Now some people will freak, feeling options have been taken away from the character. I respect that, but disagree. I think close-up fighting is specialized enough that simulating it with some training is legitimate. I LIKE the idea that there's a difference between Schmuck A grabbing you, wrestling with you while you whack at him with your gun butt, and being able to put an opponent in a submission hold. As soon as you see a specialized grappling character, you know you are in for a world of hurt and had best stay out of arm's reach. At the same time, a specialized Grappling PC has a big advantage over untrained opponents, and won't take many feats before he's tossing Stormtroopers around like ragdolls or crushing their throats. Bull (Bantha, whatever) Rush has been similarly transformed into a feat -- not linked to Grapple, but same theory of design. If you disagree, you can of course simply use the rules as stated in the feats Bantha Rush, Pin and Trip as combat choices, and leave Crush and Throw as feats. But this is one of those things I read and went "huh"?, and then on reflection realized I liked in the balance. You Grapple with clear intent now. And regardless, I love linking Trip to the Grapple roll. Tying previously separate maneuvers with separate rules to one game mechanic always pleases me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Star Wars Saga Edition [SECR] Preview #8 is Up
Top