Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dave0047" data-source="post: 5424566" data-attributes="member: 74305">But again you're missing the part where I referenced mentioning Saga in every post.... How convenient that you point that out and in doing so continue to troll.Agreed.Name-calling and attacks? Hmm... don't remember doing any such thing, just trying to explain my opinion of Saga being king while being shot down by multiple posters...Ugh. I get it, you have a thing for mods. Message them, make your post bold and red like them, whatever. They aren't needed in what is a passionate conversation on which versions of a roleplaying game are better. I say Saga, and I'll defend it when people say it's "unbalanced" and "this other game is better because <insert blatantly false statement here>".If you start with making stuff up to troll people, I guess that's why threads you post in get shut down.And here's to hoping someone takes three seconds to read my arguments and figures out that I'm actually (heatedly) discussing and defending why Saga is better, on a thread that's called "Which Version". If someone says something silly like, "Well I heard Saga Edition doesn't use d20's at all and that makes it bad and stuff", then I'll reply back with "Actually it does use d20's, it says so in the rules". Though that's not a great example, you understand what I'm saying. If that sounds "mean" or seems like an attack on the individual that is not providing an answer to the thread but just saying that Saga isn't the best because <insert blatantly false statement here>, yeah sure, I'll defend it.Ugh, I'm getting a headache. Why is this so hard? Why am I not allowed to respond with civil (and rather blunt) statements when someone tries to poke a hole in my SAGA RULEZ balloon?</blockquote>

Verification