Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Orius" data-source="post: 5338952" data-attributes="member: 8863">That seems to be the best way of handling the situation.  Like Rush said way back in "Faith" where he was against letting people stay behind, there's going to be, and had been at that point crew attrition.  The LA people give them some fresh blood, and there's not just the fighters, but a scientist as well.  You can't just keep them in the brig forever.  And killing them all off or marooning them somewhere probably won't happen; that's what the LA would do.  Wray would be against it, and I think Young would do it only as a last resort.  Again, it would be Rush who would likely suggest it for the sake of epediency.  Maybe we'll see some of what Voyager should have done with the Maquis but never really bothered.There's also the whole distrust issue theLA and Earth have of each other.  Stargate Command and perhaps the IOA don't trust the LA because they're criminals and thugs.  The LA doesn't trust Earth because they don't like their policies.   Maybe working together on Destiny will help repair relations between the two groups?  I believe that was the military contractor who wanted to fix his daughter's heart problems.Bumping off a major character is risky for the writers though.  The strangest characters (not just leads) sometimes end up with a fan base, and sometimes those fan bases can be surprisingly large.  Bumping off a well-loved character poorly can alienate a large segment of your watchers, and if they stop watching, you're going to take a rating hit.  There's also actor contracts to take into consideration, if they have a contract for the show for several years, you might not be able to just kill the character off at a whim.</blockquote>

Verification