Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Starter Set: Excerpt 3 (actual)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 6315961" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Yeah, that makes no sense to me and definitely doesn't reflect reality. Using a climbing example specifically, absolutely, I make my "best effort" each time, but here's the thing - eventually I manage to climb the rockface, even if I slipped off it the first time, or couldn't get up more than a few feet before having to hop down.</p><p></p><p>I mean, have you ever gone climbing? Serious question. Did you magically pass/fail on every rockface you encountered within 6 seconds (one round)? Obviously that's rhetorical. You didn't. Just because you make your "best effort", doesn't mean you succeed. Maybe you did something wrong? With climbing that's very easy to do, especially if you're under time-pressure.</p><p></p><p>The same applies to lockpicking - I've only done a little, super-amateur stuff (totally legal, I assure you!), but no matter how hard I try, I'm not necessarily going to succeed or fail in the first X period of time. I might get it in a few seconds, or it might take me half an hour.</p><p></p><p>There absolutely ARE situations where you only really have one shot, and time is unlikely to help. For example, trying to remember a historical fact - the chances are, either you remember it, or you don't. It's possible that you'll remember it later, but in that case I'd just put some kind of "minimum check again" limit, or just deem it "not known" and not allow another check.</p><p></p><p>I suspect what you are ignoring is the fact that in most editions of D&D, a check absolutely does <em>not</em> represent "You take as long as you need to make you best efforts to achieve something", it means "You try to achieve X in Y timeframe". These are very different things. If it represented the former, your position would make more sense, but it doesn't. It represents the latter. In 3E, take 20 represents the former.</p><p></p><p>Also, if your problem is that a random weirdo will succeed on anything DC20 or less given time, you have the real answer there: RAISE THE DC ABOVE 20. It's very simple! It's not unfair. It's pretty obvious that 3E's DC tables were put together without thinking about Take 20, and if they need to be changed for that, go ahead and change them. Just don't be telling me my PC can't climb a sub-20-DC rockface, just because I failed in one 6-second period, and then claiming that makes some kind of sense, because it doesn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 6315961, member: 18"] Yeah, that makes no sense to me and definitely doesn't reflect reality. Using a climbing example specifically, absolutely, I make my "best effort" each time, but here's the thing - eventually I manage to climb the rockface, even if I slipped off it the first time, or couldn't get up more than a few feet before having to hop down. I mean, have you ever gone climbing? Serious question. Did you magically pass/fail on every rockface you encountered within 6 seconds (one round)? Obviously that's rhetorical. You didn't. Just because you make your "best effort", doesn't mean you succeed. Maybe you did something wrong? With climbing that's very easy to do, especially if you're under time-pressure. The same applies to lockpicking - I've only done a little, super-amateur stuff (totally legal, I assure you!), but no matter how hard I try, I'm not necessarily going to succeed or fail in the first X period of time. I might get it in a few seconds, or it might take me half an hour. There absolutely ARE situations where you only really have one shot, and time is unlikely to help. For example, trying to remember a historical fact - the chances are, either you remember it, or you don't. It's possible that you'll remember it later, but in that case I'd just put some kind of "minimum check again" limit, or just deem it "not known" and not allow another check. I suspect what you are ignoring is the fact that in most editions of D&D, a check absolutely does [I]not[/I] represent "You take as long as you need to make you best efforts to achieve something", it means "You try to achieve X in Y timeframe". These are very different things. If it represented the former, your position would make more sense, but it doesn't. It represents the latter. In 3E, take 20 represents the former. Also, if your problem is that a random weirdo will succeed on anything DC20 or less given time, you have the real answer there: RAISE THE DC ABOVE 20. It's very simple! It's not unfair. It's pretty obvious that 3E's DC tables were put together without thinking about Take 20, and if they need to be changed for that, go ahead and change them. Just don't be telling me my PC can't climb a sub-20-DC rockface, just because I failed in one 6-second period, and then claiming that makes some kind of sense, because it doesn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Starter Set: Excerpt 3 (actual)
Top