Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stat Penalties/Damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackbrrd" data-source="post: 4165625" data-attributes="member: 63962"><p>Or they could just give you -2 to melee attacks, -2 to ac, -2 to reflex defence, etc. In other words no secondary effects. </p><p></p><p>Better than getting -2 to str that gives -1 to attack and -1 or -2 to damage (if you had a two-handed weapon and 18 str to begin with), and -2 to attack with your mighty composite bow, etc, etc. </p><p></p><p>I am currently playing a cleric with the strength domain(+8 str), and access to bulls strength(+4str), divine power(+6str), rightous might(+4str), prc ability(+4str) and most of these stack, except the three first which are enhancement bonuses. And, offcourse wielding a two-handed weapon, so my attack isn't scaling at the same speed as my damage). It is a royal pain in the ass recalculating my attack/damage bonus all the time. ... Actually the problem here is that I just have too many ways to buff... And it makes fights totally unpredictable for the DM. My character either has 14 str and +13 to hit, or 30str and +26 to hit... (that would take two rounds of buffing to get with quickend divine favour, divine power, rightous might, prc ability and strenth domain...). In a strange kind of way I like tinkering with my character, I have lots of options every fight (its a cleric!!!), but I know its over the top and totally unpredictable.</p><p></p><p>On another topic discussed:</p><p>Using dex damaging attacks against a dragon isn't tactics but a strategy. The strategy can be used every combat. Tactics is something that probably changes from combat to combat. </p><p></p><p>In my current group if your strategy is to nuke every monster with for instance enfeebling ray you will get the spell banned. (It clearly isn't balanced). Instead of banning a spell, we have a silent understanding: you can use spells like that sometimes, but not often enough to make the game boring. The same with the improved trip/spiked chain/enlarge person combo. It is a general strategy that works too well in 3.5. (At the same time its a big investment in feats to enable, so we just banned it.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackbrrd, post: 4165625, member: 63962"] Or they could just give you -2 to melee attacks, -2 to ac, -2 to reflex defence, etc. In other words no secondary effects. Better than getting -2 to str that gives -1 to attack and -1 or -2 to damage (if you had a two-handed weapon and 18 str to begin with), and -2 to attack with your mighty composite bow, etc, etc. I am currently playing a cleric with the strength domain(+8 str), and access to bulls strength(+4str), divine power(+6str), rightous might(+4str), prc ability(+4str) and most of these stack, except the three first which are enhancement bonuses. And, offcourse wielding a two-handed weapon, so my attack isn't scaling at the same speed as my damage). It is a royal pain in the ass recalculating my attack/damage bonus all the time. ... Actually the problem here is that I just have too many ways to buff... And it makes fights totally unpredictable for the DM. My character either has 14 str and +13 to hit, or 30str and +26 to hit... (that would take two rounds of buffing to get with quickend divine favour, divine power, rightous might, prc ability and strenth domain...). In a strange kind of way I like tinkering with my character, I have lots of options every fight (its a cleric!!!), but I know its over the top and totally unpredictable. On another topic discussed: Using dex damaging attacks against a dragon isn't tactics but a strategy. The strategy can be used every combat. Tactics is something that probably changes from combat to combat. In my current group if your strategy is to nuke every monster with for instance enfeebling ray you will get the spell banned. (It clearly isn't balanced). Instead of banning a spell, we have a silent understanding: you can use spells like that sometimes, but not often enough to make the game boring. The same with the improved trip/spiked chain/enlarge person combo. It is a general strategy that works too well in 3.5. (At the same time its a big investment in feats to enable, so we just banned it.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stat Penalties/Damage?
Top