Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stat requirements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2788292" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>The primary source rule only comes into effect in the event of a disagreement (conflict). There is no conflict under my interpretation. There is a conflict under yours. Ergo, my interpretation is better supported by the rules.</p><p>Nice. Aren't you amusing?</p><p> Oh, I disagree. It's exactly like using a magic item because it is using a magic item. The scroll doesn't even need to be used! It's even more concrete that using a spell or some other special ability.</p><p> There might be confusion on what I'm arguing, so let me briefly clear it up. I am arguing that reading a scroll is casting a spell. I'm arguing against letting someone use an item, spell, or special ability (in a similar manner) as a requirement or prerequisite. The other side, however, argues for such things and therefore I'm pointing out how to use a scroll to meet the various 'casts arcane spells' requirements. Of course, this approach is an ugly loophole and it's no surprise I'm getting such a violent backlash to it. But, it's not my recommended interpretation, so I by no means advocate it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I've also clearly stated that I don't think the rules define how to level-up and thus there's no definition either way about using temporary spells or items for prerequisites or requirements. If you allow it, fine, it's not against the RAW. If you don't allow it, fine, it's not against the RAW. But, if you allow it, that means you have defined level-up to have a real definition, in terms of combat rounds, and that you get some funky stuff as with the scrolls and other things.</p><p> I pointed out a couple sentence explicitly defined the user of the scroll as casting the spell from the scroll. Not the scroll casting the spell, the person using the scroll casting the spell. UMD is very clear about it.</p><p> One reference in the DMG, but more than one elsewhere. What does it matter if there's one, though? If there was one reference that said "You can't use bull's strength for fulling prerequisites on feat" would you toss it out as being insufficient? Do all rules need to be duplicate multiple times before they become valid? Of course not. The 'one' in one reference should only be called into question if you think there's a conflict.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2788292, member: 31734"] The primary source rule only comes into effect in the event of a disagreement (conflict). There is no conflict under my interpretation. There is a conflict under yours. Ergo, my interpretation is better supported by the rules. Nice. Aren't you amusing? Oh, I disagree. It's exactly like using a magic item because it is using a magic item. The scroll doesn't even need to be used! It's even more concrete that using a spell or some other special ability. There might be confusion on what I'm arguing, so let me briefly clear it up. I am arguing that reading a scroll is casting a spell. I'm arguing against letting someone use an item, spell, or special ability (in a similar manner) as a requirement or prerequisite. The other side, however, argues for such things and therefore I'm pointing out how to use a scroll to meet the various 'casts arcane spells' requirements. Of course, this approach is an ugly loophole and it's no surprise I'm getting such a violent backlash to it. But, it's not my recommended interpretation, so I by no means advocate it. :) I've also clearly stated that I don't think the rules define how to level-up and thus there's no definition either way about using temporary spells or items for prerequisites or requirements. If you allow it, fine, it's not against the RAW. If you don't allow it, fine, it's not against the RAW. But, if you allow it, that means you have defined level-up to have a real definition, in terms of combat rounds, and that you get some funky stuff as with the scrolls and other things. I pointed out a couple sentence explicitly defined the user of the scroll as casting the spell from the scroll. Not the scroll casting the spell, the person using the scroll casting the spell. UMD is very clear about it. One reference in the DMG, but more than one elsewhere. What does it matter if there's one, though? If there was one reference that said "You can't use bull's strength for fulling prerequisites on feat" would you toss it out as being insufficient? Do all rules need to be duplicate multiple times before they become valid? Of course not. The 'one' in one reference should only be called into question if you think there's a conflict. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stat requirements
Top