Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Statblock Formatting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 2470365" data-attributes="member: 10479"><p>Certainly sounds easy enough. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Unfortunately, as with other instances involving the OGL and d20STL, I'm personally of the belief that seeking direct approval from WotC is likely to culminate in a negative response even if they didn't have the legal standing to back it up. I think in most cases it is simply safer for them to automatically say "No" on the off chance that someone is trying to slip something by them. Who knows? Maybe on something as simple as this I'd be in error to expect a more corporate-legal reaction. I wish the OGL list-server archives were accesible. I might be able to point out some earlier instances where such an approach seemed less than potentially fruitful.</p><p></p><p>In any event, if I was to appraoch WotC on such a matter, I think I would try to make it a lot easier for them to allow it and remove the risk that they might disallow it out-of-hand. I think I would be prone to phrasing the question in such a way that they would need to be careful how they would answer, i.e. "I've seen no clear proprietary claim anywhere regarding the statistical presentation format currently in use by WotC and Paizo, so I'm wondering if I was to use it if I should expect legal proceedings to be started against me because of it?" If they say "No" you're at least as safe as you could expect to be, since anyone can start a lawsuit even with specious standing. If they say "Yes" then they've put themself in a position where they really have to take a definite stand if you even release a single page PDF with no more than a single Stat Block on it.</p><p></p><p>I don't know. Maybe I'm over-thinking it... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> <em>Why don't *you* aks them?</em> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark CMG, post: 2470365, member: 10479"] Certainly sounds easy enough. :) Unfortunately, as with other instances involving the OGL and d20STL, I'm personally of the belief that seeking direct approval from WotC is likely to culminate in a negative response even if they didn't have the legal standing to back it up. I think in most cases it is simply safer for them to automatically say "No" on the off chance that someone is trying to slip something by them. Who knows? Maybe on something as simple as this I'd be in error to expect a more corporate-legal reaction. I wish the OGL list-server archives were accesible. I might be able to point out some earlier instances where such an approach seemed less than potentially fruitful. In any event, if I was to appraoch WotC on such a matter, I think I would try to make it a lot easier for them to allow it and remove the risk that they might disallow it out-of-hand. I think I would be prone to phrasing the question in such a way that they would need to be careful how they would answer, i.e. "I've seen no clear proprietary claim anywhere regarding the statistical presentation format currently in use by WotC and Paizo, so I'm wondering if I was to use it if I should expect legal proceedings to be started against me because of it?" If they say "No" you're at least as safe as you could expect to be, since anyone can start a lawsuit even with specious standing. If they say "Yes" then they've put themself in a position where they really have to take a definite stand if you even release a single page PDF with no more than a single Stat Block on it. I don't know. Maybe I'm over-thinking it... ;) [i]Why don't *you* aks them?[/i] :p [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Statblock Formatting
Top