Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Statement on OGL from WotC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="innerdude" data-source="post: 8834855" data-attributes="member: 85870"><p>There's more to it as well than to just what is licensable from the actual rules text and fluff. </p><p></p><p>If it's a digital platform, are they going to make some areas extensible for third-party programmers? What pieces of the code? How must third-party code that extends D&D One be licensed? What pieces of the platform are off limits? What's the connection between how the platform runs and how content is stored? How must third-party content be integrated into the data storage format? How will art, stored digitally, be protected, correctly attributed, and either included or excluded from image generation AI platforms, should WotC choose to use one for certain creative endeavors?</p><p></p><p>There's a mountain of legal and licensing concerns that frankly dwarf how the exact wording of a particular feat looks in the new license. </p><p></p><p>And let's be frank too, there's a portion of WotC's audience that will be displeased and vocalize that displeasure even if WotC were to give away every inch of the IP for nothing. </p><p></p><p>Is a more open license more preferable than something that is not open? Of course. </p><p></p><p>Does it make financial sense for WotC to evaluate how previous licensing agreements worked for them, and determine if a different licensing model is in fact in their best interest? Of course it does.</p><p></p><p>It's frankly not WotC's job to try and suss out just exactly how productive one version of a license versus another is for hundreds of third-party producers; that's the 3pp's job. Should WotC consider 3pp input when doing the consideration? Yes, if they're interested in being a good long-term business partner. But they're certainly not obligated to in any cosmic moral sense. </p><p></p><p>Getting burn back now, 2 years ahead of whatever the final product release ends up being, is nuts.</p><p></p><p>If I own a retail store that sells fresh fish, I can't really be angry if my local fisherman decides he/she is better off selling tuna to Fishmongers United instead of selling tilapia to me (assuming all contractual obligations are otherwise met).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="innerdude, post: 8834855, member: 85870"] There's more to it as well than to just what is licensable from the actual rules text and fluff. If it's a digital platform, are they going to make some areas extensible for third-party programmers? What pieces of the code? How must third-party code that extends D&D One be licensed? What pieces of the platform are off limits? What's the connection between how the platform runs and how content is stored? How must third-party content be integrated into the data storage format? How will art, stored digitally, be protected, correctly attributed, and either included or excluded from image generation AI platforms, should WotC choose to use one for certain creative endeavors? There's a mountain of legal and licensing concerns that frankly dwarf how the exact wording of a particular feat looks in the new license. And let's be frank too, there's a portion of WotC's audience that will be displeased and vocalize that displeasure even if WotC were to give away every inch of the IP for nothing. Is a more open license more preferable than something that is not open? Of course. Does it make financial sense for WotC to evaluate how previous licensing agreements worked for them, and determine if a different licensing model is in fact in their best interest? Of course it does. It's frankly not WotC's job to try and suss out just exactly how productive one version of a license versus another is for hundreds of third-party producers; that's the 3pp's job. Should WotC consider 3pp input when doing the consideration? Yes, if they're interested in being a good long-term business partner. But they're certainly not obligated to in any cosmic moral sense. Getting burn back now, 2 years ahead of whatever the final product release ends up being, is nuts. If I own a retail store that sells fresh fish, I can't really be angry if my local fisherman decides he/she is better off selling tuna to Fishmongers United instead of selling tilapia to me (assuming all contractual obligations are otherwise met). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Statement on OGL from WotC
Top