Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Statistical Analysis of 3.5 Power-Attack: UNDERpowered?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Staffan" data-source="post: 1005473" data-attributes="member: 907"><p>The thing is that the big-weapon fighter is giving up more, and the light-weapon fighter (especially one fighting with two weapons) is giving up less and getting more in return.</p><p></p><p>Let's compare two characters using 3.0 power attack. Both are 5th level fighter-types chopping at a regular troll.</p><p></p><p>Fighter 1 has Strength 16, Dex 14, Weapon focus (greatsword), Weapon specialization (greatsword), Power Attack, and Cleave. He's wielding a greatsword +1, so his total attack bonus is +10 for 2d6+8 damage.</p><p></p><p>Fighter 2 has Strength 14, Dex 16, Ambidexterity, Two-weapon fighting, Weapon Focus (shortsword) and Power Attack. He's wielding a shortsword +1 and a masterwork shortsword, so his attack bonus when fighting with both weapons is +7/+7 and a damage of 1d6+3 and 1d6+1. </p><p></p><p>Their target is a troll at AC 18, which seems somewhat average for the CR (5). There were at least a few monsters below that (zombies, dire lions) and some above (green hag), so I chose that as a pretty normal AC. For the purpose of this exercise, let's ignore crits (they would benefit both fighters equally). Let's see what average damage they do at various levels of power attack.</p><p></p><p><strong>Power attack: 0</strong></p><p>Fighter 1 hits the troll on an 8 - that's 65% chance. Each attack does 2d6+8 damage (average 15). That's 9.75 points per round.</p><p>Fighter 2 hits on a 11 - 50% chance. The first attack does an average of 6.5 points and the second 4.5 points. That's 5,5 points per round.</p><p></p><p><strong>Power attack: 1</strong></p><p>Fighter 1 hits on 9 (60%) for average damage 16. That's 9,6 points per round. Note: Any amount of power attack is useless here. It's not going to get better with more power attack.</p><p>Fighter 2 hits on 12 (45%) for average 7.5 and 5.5. That's 5,85 points per round. Note that unlike the greatswordsman, the two-weapon fighter benefits from power attack.</p><p></p><p><strong> Power attack: 2</strong></p><p>Fighter 2 hits on 13 (40%) for 8.5 and 6.5, total of 6 points per round.</p><p></p><p><strong>Power attack: 3</strong></p><p>Hit on 14 (35%) for 9.5 and 7.5, total 5.95 points. Power attack is no longer useful.</p><p></p><p>Still, the example shows that the greatswordsman didn't benefit from power attack at all, whereas the two-weapon fighter had a sweet spot at 2 points of power attack. This means that the two-weapon fighter benefits more (in <strong>absolute</strong> terms), even if he starts out in a worse position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Staffan, post: 1005473, member: 907"] The thing is that the big-weapon fighter is giving up more, and the light-weapon fighter (especially one fighting with two weapons) is giving up less and getting more in return. Let's compare two characters using 3.0 power attack. Both are 5th level fighter-types chopping at a regular troll. Fighter 1 has Strength 16, Dex 14, Weapon focus (greatsword), Weapon specialization (greatsword), Power Attack, and Cleave. He's wielding a greatsword +1, so his total attack bonus is +10 for 2d6+8 damage. Fighter 2 has Strength 14, Dex 16, Ambidexterity, Two-weapon fighting, Weapon Focus (shortsword) and Power Attack. He's wielding a shortsword +1 and a masterwork shortsword, so his attack bonus when fighting with both weapons is +7/+7 and a damage of 1d6+3 and 1d6+1. Their target is a troll at AC 18, which seems somewhat average for the CR (5). There were at least a few monsters below that (zombies, dire lions) and some above (green hag), so I chose that as a pretty normal AC. For the purpose of this exercise, let's ignore crits (they would benefit both fighters equally). Let's see what average damage they do at various levels of power attack. [b]Power attack: 0[/b] Fighter 1 hits the troll on an 8 - that's 65% chance. Each attack does 2d6+8 damage (average 15). That's 9.75 points per round. Fighter 2 hits on a 11 - 50% chance. The first attack does an average of 6.5 points and the second 4.5 points. That's 5,5 points per round. [b]Power attack: 1[/b] Fighter 1 hits on 9 (60%) for average damage 16. That's 9,6 points per round. Note: Any amount of power attack is useless here. It's not going to get better with more power attack. Fighter 2 hits on 12 (45%) for average 7.5 and 5.5. That's 5,85 points per round. Note that unlike the greatswordsman, the two-weapon fighter benefits from power attack. [b] Power attack: 2[/b] Fighter 2 hits on 13 (40%) for 8.5 and 6.5, total of 6 points per round. [b]Power attack: 3[/b] Hit on 14 (35%) for 9.5 and 7.5, total 5.95 points. Power attack is no longer useful. Still, the example shows that the greatswordsman didn't benefit from power attack at all, whereas the two-weapon fighter had a sweet spot at 2 points of power attack. This means that the two-weapon fighter benefits more (in [b]absolute[/b] terms), even if he starts out in a worse position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Statistical Analysis of 3.5 Power-Attack: UNDERpowered?
Top