Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Statistical Analysis of the Classes - popularity vs. power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Graythebruce" data-source="post: 340063" data-attributes="member: 6421"><p><strong>Amendment and response</strong></p><p></p><p>die_kluge wrote:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Ah, well. You have a point there.</p><p></p><p>If the DM's challenges are *so obviously* designed just to give you something to do, that certainly could get annoying pretty quick. </p><p></p><p>Allow me to amend my earlier statement by breaking it up a bit: </p><p></p><p>1. DMs should balance scenarios and campaigns so a wide range of activities (intrigue, politics, warfare, investigation, dungeon-delving, wilderness exploration) are incorporated into the story. This necessarily has the effect of discouraging dominant classes.</p><p></p><p>2. When designing encounters, DMs should keep an eye out for ways they might provide openings for the application of underutilized class abilities, provided these challenges are good ones (see #3 below). </p><p></p><p>3. A good challenge for a specialized ability should not seem contrived; it should grow organically from and have real consequences for the storyline. The DM should not goad the PC (directly or through NPCs) into using his or her ability; simply putting the opportunity there is enough. As a final condition, the specialized challenge ideally should not sideline other PCs. (This is the portion I should have included in my earlier post. Apologies.)</p><p></p><p>Hence, a musical duel between bards in a bar isn't great. But if the chief villain's herald (a bard) arrives in a bar and tries to convince the locals to lynch the party, that's another thing. The party's bard has an obvious target for abilities like Countersong, and the rest of the party is still engaged. Moreover, the encounter seems like a plausible extension of the storyline. </p><p></p><p>One good test for such a challenge is this: Would the story move forward if the key PC weren't there? The aforementioned singing contest fails this test. But the villain's herald passes because the party still has to deal with him -- having a bard of their own just makes the whole encounter easier. </p><p></p><p>This was the philosophy that guided the other encounters I described. I don't think my players have even picked up on the fact that the current setting is designed to give our archer the limelight for a change. The other PCs, after all, are still effective -- it's just that their kill ratios have dropped while the archer is killing a greater proportion of enemies than he used to. </p><p></p><p>Moreover, I didn't force them off the beaten path into these woods -- I gave them a bunch of choices and this was their pick; when planning the encounters, I simply designed the sets and foes to encourage sniping. </p><p></p><p>The no-sideline rule is a good one for even "routine" specialized encounters like trap disarmament. An example: assume the party has some sort of time limit, during which it must get past a door, secure an object, and return to some location where said object is handy. Unfortunately, the door is both locked and guarded. The chief guardian is a singing golem whose voice has a *hold person* effect on those within 15 feet of it -- and the floor around the door is littered with the corpses of slain would-be intruders, who animate to attack anyone left helpless by the golem's song. Here we have an encounter in which a rogue uses trap/lock skills, the party's bard can use countersong, the cleric can use turn undead, and the fighter can focus on the golem while the rogue is inside grabbing the loot. This is an extreme example, in that it threatens to violate the "contrivance" rule I listed above -- but it is a fair example of what I mean by no sidelining. </p><p></p><p>In short, if your DM had you quell an unruly crowd as a kind of "random" solo encounter, then yuck. In fact, double yuck.</p><p></p><p>But if the unruly crowd was a logical consequence of the existing story, if the PCs still had something to do during the scene, if the DM didn't goad you into using your ability (it's your call after all), then I don't see why anyone would complain about it -- at least, not as it's described. </p><p></p><p>- Graham R. Scott</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Graythebruce, post: 340063, member: 6421"] [b]Amendment and response[/b] die_kluge wrote: Ah, well. You have a point there. If the DM's challenges are *so obviously* designed just to give you something to do, that certainly could get annoying pretty quick. Allow me to amend my earlier statement by breaking it up a bit: 1. DMs should balance scenarios and campaigns so a wide range of activities (intrigue, politics, warfare, investigation, dungeon-delving, wilderness exploration) are incorporated into the story. This necessarily has the effect of discouraging dominant classes. 2. When designing encounters, DMs should keep an eye out for ways they might provide openings for the application of underutilized class abilities, provided these challenges are good ones (see #3 below). 3. A good challenge for a specialized ability should not seem contrived; it should grow organically from and have real consequences for the storyline. The DM should not goad the PC (directly or through NPCs) into using his or her ability; simply putting the opportunity there is enough. As a final condition, the specialized challenge ideally should not sideline other PCs. (This is the portion I should have included in my earlier post. Apologies.) Hence, a musical duel between bards in a bar isn't great. But if the chief villain's herald (a bard) arrives in a bar and tries to convince the locals to lynch the party, that's another thing. The party's bard has an obvious target for abilities like Countersong, and the rest of the party is still engaged. Moreover, the encounter seems like a plausible extension of the storyline. One good test for such a challenge is this: Would the story move forward if the key PC weren't there? The aforementioned singing contest fails this test. But the villain's herald passes because the party still has to deal with him -- having a bard of their own just makes the whole encounter easier. This was the philosophy that guided the other encounters I described. I don't think my players have even picked up on the fact that the current setting is designed to give our archer the limelight for a change. The other PCs, after all, are still effective -- it's just that their kill ratios have dropped while the archer is killing a greater proportion of enemies than he used to. Moreover, I didn't force them off the beaten path into these woods -- I gave them a bunch of choices and this was their pick; when planning the encounters, I simply designed the sets and foes to encourage sniping. The no-sideline rule is a good one for even "routine" specialized encounters like trap disarmament. An example: assume the party has some sort of time limit, during which it must get past a door, secure an object, and return to some location where said object is handy. Unfortunately, the door is both locked and guarded. The chief guardian is a singing golem whose voice has a *hold person* effect on those within 15 feet of it -- and the floor around the door is littered with the corpses of slain would-be intruders, who animate to attack anyone left helpless by the golem's song. Here we have an encounter in which a rogue uses trap/lock skills, the party's bard can use countersong, the cleric can use turn undead, and the fighter can focus on the golem while the rogue is inside grabbing the loot. This is an extreme example, in that it threatens to violate the "contrivance" rule I listed above -- but it is a fair example of what I mean by no sidelining. In short, if your DM had you quell an unruly crowd as a kind of "random" solo encounter, then yuck. In fact, double yuck. But if the unruly crowd was a logical consequence of the existing story, if the PCs still had something to do during the scene, if the DM didn't goad you into using your ability (it's your call after all), then I don't see why anyone would complain about it -- at least, not as it's described. - Graham R. Scott [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Statistical Analysis of the Classes - popularity vs. power
Top