Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Iosue" data-source="post: 6089458" data-attributes="member: 6680772">I think the first statement is entirely reasonable.&nbsp; Two years of playtesting is certainly a grind, especially if you're going through iterations you really have no interest in.&nbsp; That said, sporadic playtesting can help.&nbsp; One of things often said of 4e is that it plays better than it reads, and that while a fighter and a wizard might look the same on the page, with their AEDU, in actual play they feel quite different.&nbsp; The same can certainly be true of 5e.I would urge you to fill out the playtest surveys in any case, though.&nbsp; They're not just for those who've played the game.&nbsp; Particularly since it looks more and more like they've got the Basic game locked down, now is the time to really let them know how you feel about the expanded options, and the surveys have repeatedly been held up as the best way to do that.&nbsp; It's the best way to mitigate the effect you fear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Iosue, post: 6089458, member: 6680772"] I think the first statement is entirely reasonable. Two years of playtesting is certainly a grind, especially if you're going through iterations you really have no interest in. That said, sporadic playtesting can help. One of things often said of 4e is that it plays better than it reads, and that while a fighter and a wizard might look the same on the page, with their AEDU, in actual play they feel quite different. The same can certainly be true of 5e. I would urge you to fill out the playtest surveys in any case, though. They're not just for those who've played the game. Particularly since it looks more and more like they've got the Basic game locked down, now is the time to really let them know how you feel about the expanded options, and the surveys have repeatedly been held up as the best way to do that. It's the best way to mitigate the effect you fear. [/QUOTE]

Verification