Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stay back! The joy of OAs.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zaruthustran" data-source="post: 4318663" data-attributes="member: 1457"><p>If such a rule existed, you'd be right. Alas, the rule I think you're referencing is not general. It's very specific.</p><p></p><p>Under "moving provokes", on page 290, the rule says "If an enemy leaves a square adjacent to you, you can make an opportunity attack against that enemy."</p><p></p><p>This rule very specifically refers to trigger "leaves a square adjacent". It's not general at all.</p><p></p><p>And, regardless of what you consider general, it has *nothing* to do with the trigger in question: the trigger from Polearm Gamble: "When a nonadjacent enemy enters a square adjacent to you, you can make an opportunity attack with a polearm against that enemy"</p><p></p><p>That Polearm Gamble trigger is extremely specific, and would therefore (by your argument) trump any general rule, anyway. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's no such thing as "movement-based OAs". That is not a game term. There's only "Opportunity Attacks", and the rules are laid out in full on page 290, along with two common triggers (leaving a square, and attacking with a ranged or area attack). There are other triggers, and those triggers follow the general rules for OAs.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's correct.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll agree that the two common triggers require an adjacent target--I've quoted the rules that state that. But that requirement only applies to <u>those two specific triggers</u>. It's not a requirement for OAs in general. One example of is threatening reach. Another is Polearm Gamble. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The weapon quality "reach" is not what gives this build its OA. Polearm Gamble provides the trigger. The rules on p290 state that OAs require that you are "Able to Attack: You can’t make an opportunity attack unless you are able to make a melee basic attack and you can see your enemy."</p><p></p><p>Reach allows you to make a basic attack against nonadjacent enemies. Polearm Gamble provides an OA trigger that, due to the timing of OAs, takes place while the enemy is nonadjacent. Since you're able to make a basic attack against nonadjacent enemies, you are able to perform the OA using the trigger provided by Polearm Gamble.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's the technical part that's important. You can't "save" a triggered OA. You have to take it when triggered, or not take it at all. You hit the guy before he leaves and before he moves adjacent. If you wait until he arrives, you've given up your interrupt. The triggering event has passed. If you go by the way you describe, it just doesn't work, mechanically.</p><p></p><p>See the discussion above with Big J Money about the logical consequences of shoehorning the timing of the OA from Polearm Gamble into taking place *after* the target has arrived in the adjacent square. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now you're making up rules. You're claiming that the action "Opportunity Action" has a blanket requirement that the target is adjacent. That's just not true. There is no rule support for that claim. There is, however, a blanket rule for OAs that you must be able to make a basic melee attack against the target. This build satisfies that requirement.</p><p></p><p>You're trying to apply the rules for the trigger "when an enemy leaves an adjacent square" to the completely different trigger "when an enemy enters an adjacent square." They're two different triggers.</p><p></p><p>And, again, threatening reach does not apply. This build does not use threatening reach.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This sentence does not address my argument. I'll repeat it: If you're arguing against the OA from Polearm Gamble takes place *after* the move adjacent is completed, then you must also argue that the OA from the specific trigger "Moving Provokes" takes place *after* the move away from adjacent.</p><p></p><p>The trigger from Polearm Gamble results in the OA taking place while the target is not adjacent. That's how the interrupt works, and you can't argue otherwise unless you also adjust the timing of the "Moving provokes" trigger. </p><p></p><p>So, by saying that the Polearm Gamble OA interrupts "enter adjacent", and takes place while the target is nonadjacent, the rules are saying that if you have this feat and have a polearm you can take your opportunity attack while the target is nonadjacent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zaruthustran, post: 4318663, member: 1457"] If such a rule existed, you'd be right. Alas, the rule I think you're referencing is not general. It's very specific. Under "moving provokes", on page 290, the rule says "If an enemy leaves a square adjacent to you, you can make an opportunity attack against that enemy." This rule very specifically refers to trigger "leaves a square adjacent". It's not general at all. And, regardless of what you consider general, it has *nothing* to do with the trigger in question: the trigger from Polearm Gamble: "When a nonadjacent enemy enters a square adjacent to you, you can make an opportunity attack with a polearm against that enemy" That Polearm Gamble trigger is extremely specific, and would therefore (by your argument) trump any general rule, anyway. There's no such thing as "movement-based OAs". That is not a game term. There's only "Opportunity Attacks", and the rules are laid out in full on page 290, along with two common triggers (leaving a square, and attacking with a ranged or area attack). There are other triggers, and those triggers follow the general rules for OAs. That's correct. I'll agree that the two common triggers require an adjacent target--I've quoted the rules that state that. But that requirement only applies to [u]those two specific triggers[/u]. It's not a requirement for OAs in general. One example of is threatening reach. Another is Polearm Gamble. The weapon quality "reach" is not what gives this build its OA. Polearm Gamble provides the trigger. The rules on p290 state that OAs require that you are "Able to Attack: You can’t make an opportunity attack unless you are able to make a melee basic attack and you can see your enemy." Reach allows you to make a basic attack against nonadjacent enemies. Polearm Gamble provides an OA trigger that, due to the timing of OAs, takes place while the enemy is nonadjacent. Since you're able to make a basic attack against nonadjacent enemies, you are able to perform the OA using the trigger provided by Polearm Gamble. Agreed. It's the technical part that's important. You can't "save" a triggered OA. You have to take it when triggered, or not take it at all. You hit the guy before he leaves and before he moves adjacent. If you wait until he arrives, you've given up your interrupt. The triggering event has passed. If you go by the way you describe, it just doesn't work, mechanically. See the discussion above with Big J Money about the logical consequences of shoehorning the timing of the OA from Polearm Gamble into taking place *after* the target has arrived in the adjacent square. Now you're making up rules. You're claiming that the action "Opportunity Action" has a blanket requirement that the target is adjacent. That's just not true. There is no rule support for that claim. There is, however, a blanket rule for OAs that you must be able to make a basic melee attack against the target. This build satisfies that requirement. You're trying to apply the rules for the trigger "when an enemy leaves an adjacent square" to the completely different trigger "when an enemy enters an adjacent square." They're two different triggers. And, again, threatening reach does not apply. This build does not use threatening reach. This sentence does not address my argument. I'll repeat it: If you're arguing against the OA from Polearm Gamble takes place *after* the move adjacent is completed, then you must also argue that the OA from the specific trigger "Moving Provokes" takes place *after* the move away from adjacent. The trigger from Polearm Gamble results in the OA taking place while the target is not adjacent. That's how the interrupt works, and you can't argue otherwise unless you also adjust the timing of the "Moving provokes" trigger. So, by saying that the Polearm Gamble OA interrupts "enter adjacent", and takes place while the target is nonadjacent, the rules are saying that if you have this feat and have a polearm you can take your opportunity attack while the target is nonadjacent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stay back! The joy of OAs.
Top