Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth - back to RAW. PEACH
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the_redbeard" data-source="post: 4402623" data-attributes="member: 22644"><p>It is an exception consistent with the theme: you need to take an action to get an active perception roll. It is consistent with the exception - not a contradiction to the exception.</p><p></p><p>No where does it specify that an active perception check be granted without an action. Conversely, passive perception checks are said to be called by the DM, 'usually', etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As you say, that is consistent with all opposed checks. I'm not saying you need an action to make an active check with any skill - the exception is only for the perception skill.</p><p>Try again.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If they are using their standard actions to search, they get their roll versus the stealther's previous roll.</p><p></p><p>The rules are clear that you need to actually take time of your turn to get an active perception check.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. </p><p>It makes the perception skill a valuable skill. If someone in the party (or a monster encounter group) invests as heavily in perception as a stealther invests in stealth, then a passive perception check is just about the average stealth roll.</p><p></p><p>Stealthers are not invincible. But it does necessitate an arms race. Clerics should spend a feat for skill training. Rangers will be valuable in the party - and so on. If you really have a problem, you could use Aid Another.</p><p>There's also the Ready Action - which could even be used for a charge.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not one to disavow anything CSR says, and I don't always get the answers I'm seeking.</p><p>But I do honestly feel your question was a poor one - so I said so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You didn't quote the opposing rules at all. That's different than stressing - that's omission.</p><p></p><p>You effectively asked the CSR, "I think the sky is blue. On page 1 of the Daily Handbook, it says the sky is blue. Am I right?"</p><p></p><p>While Mark B is saying, "On page 2 of the Daily Handbook, it says the sky can sometimes be orange during sunrises and sunsets. VK, your proposed simplification of sky color doesn't cover all situations."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the_redbeard, post: 4402623, member: 22644"] It is an exception consistent with the theme: you need to take an action to get an active perception roll. It is consistent with the exception - not a contradiction to the exception. No where does it specify that an active perception check be granted without an action. Conversely, passive perception checks are said to be called by the DM, 'usually', etc. As you say, that is consistent with all opposed checks. I'm not saying you need an action to make an active check with any skill - the exception is only for the perception skill. Try again. If they are using their standard actions to search, they get their roll versus the stealther's previous roll. The rules are clear that you need to actually take time of your turn to get an active perception check. No. It makes the perception skill a valuable skill. If someone in the party (or a monster encounter group) invests as heavily in perception as a stealther invests in stealth, then a passive perception check is just about the average stealth roll. Stealthers are not invincible. But it does necessitate an arms race. Clerics should spend a feat for skill training. Rangers will be valuable in the party - and so on. If you really have a problem, you could use Aid Another. There's also the Ready Action - which could even be used for a charge. I am not one to disavow anything CSR says, and I don't always get the answers I'm seeking. But I do honestly feel your question was a poor one - so I said so. You didn't quote the opposing rules at all. That's different than stressing - that's omission. You effectively asked the CSR, "I think the sky is blue. On page 1 of the Daily Handbook, it says the sky is blue. Am I right?" While Mark B is saying, "On page 2 of the Daily Handbook, it says the sky can sometimes be orange during sunrises and sunsets. VK, your proposed simplification of sky color doesn't cover all situations." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth - back to RAW. PEACH
Top