Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth Checks - How do you handle them?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 7039274" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>Turn based checks effectively mean that you <em>will</em> fail your infiltration unless your stealth score is so good that you don't actually need to roll. Do you have a 75% chance of remaining undetected for one roll? Well after 5 rounds, you've got a 23% chance of being undetected.</p><p></p><p>Now you might be effectively doing what I suggested: treating a failed stealth roll as a step down a track towards detection - a guard comes to investigate a funny noise - rather than full blown detection itself, which allows chances to correct for a failure.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Agreed. Passive checks in this edition are so fraught with inconsistency they basically have no value.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you'll find that absolute impossible to back up, and I have personal experience to the contrary. Any time I've gotten lost, I've been quite aware ahead of time that I'm not sure the path I have chosen is correct.</p><p></p><p>There are certain extremes which would make you aware, and certain levels of screw up where you would find a deception unbelievable and be likely to pre-emptively take countermeasures. For instance: you are walking across an open field, approaching a target from the rear. You step on a twig, which makes a large cracking sound when you are about 10ft from the target.</p><p></p><p>I imagine that an amateur at stealth would freeze and watch their target for signs they heard, then be flabbergasted when they didn't actually get a surprise round.</p><p></p><p>I imagine a pro would immediately dive 10ft forward and engage, simply assuming they had been heard.</p><p></p><p>I can't imagine a pro not noticing that they screwed up.</p><p></p><p>Extensive research proves the opposite. Incompetent people are more likely to overestimate their ability: they simply don't know what they don't know. Competent tend to underestimate their own ability.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 7039274, member: 5890"] Turn based checks effectively mean that you [i]will[/i] fail your infiltration unless your stealth score is so good that you don't actually need to roll. Do you have a 75% chance of remaining undetected for one roll? Well after 5 rounds, you've got a 23% chance of being undetected. Now you might be effectively doing what I suggested: treating a failed stealth roll as a step down a track towards detection - a guard comes to investigate a funny noise - rather than full blown detection itself, which allows chances to correct for a failure. Agreed. Passive checks in this edition are so fraught with inconsistency they basically have no value. I think you'll find that absolute impossible to back up, and I have personal experience to the contrary. Any time I've gotten lost, I've been quite aware ahead of time that I'm not sure the path I have chosen is correct. There are certain extremes which would make you aware, and certain levels of screw up where you would find a deception unbelievable and be likely to pre-emptively take countermeasures. For instance: you are walking across an open field, approaching a target from the rear. You step on a twig, which makes a large cracking sound when you are about 10ft from the target. I imagine that an amateur at stealth would freeze and watch their target for signs they heard, then be flabbergasted when they didn't actually get a surprise round. I imagine a pro would immediately dive 10ft forward and engage, simply assuming they had been heard. I can't imagine a pro not noticing that they screwed up. Extensive research proves the opposite. Incompetent people are more likely to overestimate their ability: they simply don't know what they don't know. Competent tend to underestimate their own ability. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth Checks - How do you handle them?
Top