Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth & Perception
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chaotix42" data-source="post: 4274269" data-attributes="member: 40530"><p>OK, I think I have the rules for hiding all sorted out. Someone step in here if they think I've got something wrong. </p><p></p><p>First, we have the rules for making "Checks without Rolls" on pg. 179 of the PHB. This states that "<em>in a calm environment (outside an encounter), when dealing with a mundane task, you can rely on sheer ability to achieve results</em>." It goes on to then describe Taking 10 and Passive checks. </p><p></p><p>- Outside of combat or other encounters your DM usually uses the PC's passive Perception checks. Monsters sneaking up to ambush the PCs make Stealth checks vs. the PC's passive Perception checks, for example. </p><p></p><p>- If a monster (or monsters) fails to beat a PC's Passive perception then they may be spotted:</p><p></p><p>a) If all they have is concealment or cover to a PC they can see the monster. </p><p></p><p>b) If the monster has total concealment or superior cover to a PC he instead knows the direction to the monster and has a vague idea of the distance to their square; if the passive Perception check beats the Stealth check by 10 or more the PC pinpoints the monster's square.</p><p></p><p>So, a few monsters roll poorly on their Stealth checks, starting an encounter. </p><p></p><p>- In combat the monsters are moving around, taking their attacks and using Stealth whenever possible. Now that we're in an encounter the PCs stop using their passive Perception checks and can begin rolling their Perception checks when an Opposed Check is called for (as per the "Opposed Checks" and "Checks without Rolls" rules on pgs. 178 and 179 of the PHB). </p><p></p><p>- When a monster makes a Stealth check it can roll Stealth as part of whatever action it is trying to perform stealthily. Most monsters cannot attack and remain hidden while doing so, so often an attack will be followed by a retreat into concealment or cover, allowing a Stealth check with the appropriate modifiers. At this point all observers get a chance to spot the monster depending on whether the monster has concealment/cover or total concealment:</p><p></p><p>a) If the monster only has concealment/cover to an observer it can still be seen - the opposed Perception check is <strong>rolled</strong> with no action required. Those that beat the monster's Stealth check can see it and attack it normally, with the standard penalties for attacking obscured targets. Those that do not beat the monster's Stealth check cannot see their target and must use the "Targeting What You Can't See" sidebar on pg. 281</p><p></p><p>b) If the monster has total concealment to a target, you can't see the target. If you can't see the target you use the "Targeting What You Can't See" sidebar on pg. 281. At this point the opposed check is the monster's Stealth check vs. the observer's <strong>passive</strong> Perception check, despite the "Checks without Rolls" rules on pg. 179. If the passive Perception check beats the Stealth check the observer knows the direction to where the monster ended its move, and if it beats it by 10 the observer knows what square the monster ended its move in. If the observer needs to, on their turn they can roll an active Perception as a minor action to try their hand at the whole process once again. </p><p></p><p>There is a bit more to it but these are the basics. The way that Stealth and Perception interact with one another is poorly explained and at times contradictory but I think I've got it right. Any objections?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chaotix42, post: 4274269, member: 40530"] OK, I think I have the rules for hiding all sorted out. Someone step in here if they think I've got something wrong. First, we have the rules for making "Checks without Rolls" on pg. 179 of the PHB. This states that "[I]in a calm environment (outside an encounter), when dealing with a mundane task, you can rely on sheer ability to achieve results[/I]." It goes on to then describe Taking 10 and Passive checks. - Outside of combat or other encounters your DM usually uses the PC's passive Perception checks. Monsters sneaking up to ambush the PCs make Stealth checks vs. the PC's passive Perception checks, for example. - If a monster (or monsters) fails to beat a PC's Passive perception then they may be spotted: a) If all they have is concealment or cover to a PC they can see the monster. b) If the monster has total concealment or superior cover to a PC he instead knows the direction to the monster and has a vague idea of the distance to their square; if the passive Perception check beats the Stealth check by 10 or more the PC pinpoints the monster's square. So, a few monsters roll poorly on their Stealth checks, starting an encounter. - In combat the monsters are moving around, taking their attacks and using Stealth whenever possible. Now that we're in an encounter the PCs stop using their passive Perception checks and can begin rolling their Perception checks when an Opposed Check is called for (as per the "Opposed Checks" and "Checks without Rolls" rules on pgs. 178 and 179 of the PHB). - When a monster makes a Stealth check it can roll Stealth as part of whatever action it is trying to perform stealthily. Most monsters cannot attack and remain hidden while doing so, so often an attack will be followed by a retreat into concealment or cover, allowing a Stealth check with the appropriate modifiers. At this point all observers get a chance to spot the monster depending on whether the monster has concealment/cover or total concealment: a) If the monster only has concealment/cover to an observer it can still be seen - the opposed Perception check is [B]rolled[/B] with no action required. Those that beat the monster's Stealth check can see it and attack it normally, with the standard penalties for attacking obscured targets. Those that do not beat the monster's Stealth check cannot see their target and must use the "Targeting What You Can't See" sidebar on pg. 281 b) If the monster has total concealment to a target, you can't see the target. If you can't see the target you use the "Targeting What You Can't See" sidebar on pg. 281. At this point the opposed check is the monster's Stealth check vs. the observer's [B]passive[/B] Perception check, despite the "Checks without Rolls" rules on pg. 179. If the passive Perception check beats the Stealth check the observer knows the direction to where the monster ended its move, and if it beats it by 10 the observer knows what square the monster ended its move in. If the observer needs to, on their turn they can roll an active Perception as a minor action to try their hand at the whole process once again. There is a bit more to it but these are the basics. The way that Stealth and Perception interact with one another is poorly explained and at times contradictory but I think I've got it right. Any objections? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth & Perception
Top