Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 6650365" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>You can reach the same conclusion by using deductive reasoning, but it is <em>absolutely</em> unnecessary. The deductive process would go something like this:</p><p></p><p>1. Creatures who move behind objects with nowhere else to go are still there.</p><p></p><p>2. That creature moved behind an object with nowhere else to go.</p><p></p><p>3 Therefore, that creature is still there.</p><p></p><p>Humans become capable of deductive reasoning in early adolescence, so according to your reasoning we shouldn't expect a creature less intelligent than a typical eleven year old to comprehend that the creature is still behind the pillar.</p><p></p><p>However, humans less than a year old are capable of understanding that objects continue to exist even when they can no longer be seen or heard. This is called <em>object permanence,</em> and it doesn't require the use of logic at all. The mere fact that the creature existed before it went behind the pillar leads to the belief, or the assumption, that the creature continues to exist behind the pillar, which actually doesn't follow logically. The creature could, in fact, be anywhere, or actually cease to exist at all. Yet the brain learns to make this somewhat illogical leap in infancy because, through trial and error, the child develops a <em>sense</em> of how objects behave. Logic, and especially deductive reasoning, come much later.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps we're using different definitions of perception. Here's a description from Wikipedia that I think is quite nice:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>So you see that memory has <em>everything</em> to do with the way we understand the raw sensory information we receive from our environment. Without that understanding, there really is no perception.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I understand what you're saying here about the timing of the Stealth check. The movements you're describing, however, are inextricably tied to the act of hiding. How would the character open and move through the secret door, and not be detected if she were not doing so stealthily? Those movements are the attempt at hiding that you are describing. That's when you should be making a Stealth check. What good is it to sneak quietly behind a pillar in full view of your enemies? You see, you're not hiding behind the pillar anymore. You're hiding inside the pillar, behind the secret door. Getting there is your attempt to hide.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course I'm not going to mess with the rule of cool, so in all sincerity, if this is fun for you, have at it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 6650365, member: 6787503"] You can reach the same conclusion by using deductive reasoning, but it is [I]absolutely[/I] unnecessary. The deductive process would go something like this: 1. Creatures who move behind objects with nowhere else to go are still there. 2. That creature moved behind an object with nowhere else to go. 3 Therefore, that creature is still there. Humans become capable of deductive reasoning in early adolescence, so according to your reasoning we shouldn't expect a creature less intelligent than a typical eleven year old to comprehend that the creature is still behind the pillar. However, humans less than a year old are capable of understanding that objects continue to exist even when they can no longer be seen or heard. This is called [I]object permanence,[/I] and it doesn't require the use of logic at all. The mere fact that the creature existed before it went behind the pillar leads to the belief, or the assumption, that the creature continues to exist behind the pillar, which actually doesn't follow logically. The creature could, in fact, be anywhere, or actually cease to exist at all. Yet the brain learns to make this somewhat illogical leap in infancy because, through trial and error, the child develops a [I]sense[/I] of how objects behave. Logic, and especially deductive reasoning, come much later. Perhaps we're using different definitions of perception. Here's a description from Wikipedia that I think is quite nice: So you see that memory has [I]everything[/I] to do with the way we understand the raw sensory information we receive from our environment. Without that understanding, there really is no perception. I understand what you're saying here about the timing of the Stealth check. The movements you're describing, however, are inextricably tied to the act of hiding. How would the character open and move through the secret door, and not be detected if she were not doing so stealthily? Those movements are the attempt at hiding that you are describing. That's when you should be making a Stealth check. What good is it to sneak quietly behind a pillar in full view of your enemies? You see, you're not hiding behind the pillar anymore. You're hiding inside the pillar, behind the secret door. Getting there is your attempt to hide. Of course I'm not going to mess with the rule of cool, so in all sincerity, if this is fun for you, have at it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stealth
Top