Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Clay_More" data-source="post: 798872" data-attributes="member: 9813">Well, if there's anything I would prefer altering regarding the Steam Cannon, it would have to be damage. Since it has x3 Crit, crit range cant be altered. The damage could be turned up to 3d6, which would make it greater than bows & such, even with some extra damage from being Mighty & such. I was actually considering damage bump for Steam Mace as well. I have been so lucky that someone was so nice as to burrow my PHB & DMG for "a day" which occured a week ago. As for the Pneumatic Arm, it might be more usable if it was Pneumatic Arms that granted a +10 strength bonus (still -6 dex). Strength would still be a big bonus and there wouldn't be problems with the concept. I thing I was thinking about myself, was some of the logical problems with making it two separate arms. What if someone wielded a sword in his left, non-pneumatic arm? He would still receive the bonus to strength if he had his right arm Pneumatized. Then I would have to say that the bonus only is given to people wielding things in the Grafted Arm and that two-handed weapons get effect from both etc etc. Simpler to keep it a flat +10 bonus and simply call it Pneumatic Arms. It is true, the argumentation can never be used that Players wont have access. Market Price is used equally much by DM's when determining what they give their critters.</blockquote>