Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
STILL No Character Builder Update?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P1NBACK" data-source="post: 5342577" data-attributes="member: 83768"><p>I don't see anyone flying into a rage. I just see disappointed and dissatisfied customers who have come to expect this service as part of their subscription package. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>lol... It's one thing to "follow the terms" and another to abide by an expectation set by the service you are providing and the paying customers needs and wants. </p><p></p><p>As the analogy said before, when I go into a restaurant, that restaurant may not be legally obliged to give me good customer service, serve my food quickly and hot, and refill my drinks when they are low. But, it's definitely expected. </p><p></p><p>If WotC wants to keep customers (and it certainly appears they do) they refund the dissatisfied customers. Same concept. Otherwise, I cancel my annual subscription entirely (which I've had since the get-go) and you don't get any of my hard-earned dollars. Yeah? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh yeah. I definitely expect companies to go "above and beyond" - that's what any customer expects. That's what separates good, successful companies from lousy ones. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think anyone is arguing about a company "doing nothing wrong" in this sense. It's about the company providing the service as expected. </p><p></p><p>The reason that clause is in there is not because WotC isn't obliged to provide the updates, it's because WotC wants legal backing so they don't get sued in an instance where they don't get the updates out. </p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean the customers don't want/need/expect those updates. And a smart company does well to ensure that the customer is serviced in this respect. </p><p></p><p>In the example of your milk man business, if I were your competitor, I would probably have a similar contract (to avoid being sued), but where you would turn a cold shoulder to the customer who didn't get their milk, I'd give them a free month's supply, or extend their contract, or give them twice as much milk. It's called customer service. When we enter into these contracts, we do well by each other to maintain a reasonable business relationship. WotC surely isn't going to "patiently wait a month" if I skip my fees. </p><p></p><p>It's a two-way street. </p><p></p><p>And, luckily, WotC doesn't have your philosophy on customer service and expectations. Luckily, WotC is the milk man that wants to take care of their customer base (because as any business major will tell you, it costs more to get a new customer than to keep an old one - especially those loyal enough to stay with you even though you completely butchered the original vision of the product). </p><p></p><p>Yeah?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P1NBACK, post: 5342577, member: 83768"] I don't see anyone flying into a rage. I just see disappointed and dissatisfied customers who have come to expect this service as part of their subscription package. lol... It's one thing to "follow the terms" and another to abide by an expectation set by the service you are providing and the paying customers needs and wants. As the analogy said before, when I go into a restaurant, that restaurant may not be legally obliged to give me good customer service, serve my food quickly and hot, and refill my drinks when they are low. But, it's definitely expected. If WotC wants to keep customers (and it certainly appears they do) they refund the dissatisfied customers. Same concept. Otherwise, I cancel my annual subscription entirely (which I've had since the get-go) and you don't get any of my hard-earned dollars. Yeah? Oh yeah. I definitely expect companies to go "above and beyond" - that's what any customer expects. That's what separates good, successful companies from lousy ones. I don't think anyone is arguing about a company "doing nothing wrong" in this sense. It's about the company providing the service as expected. The reason that clause is in there is not because WotC isn't obliged to provide the updates, it's because WotC wants legal backing so they don't get sued in an instance where they don't get the updates out. That doesn't mean the customers don't want/need/expect those updates. And a smart company does well to ensure that the customer is serviced in this respect. In the example of your milk man business, if I were your competitor, I would probably have a similar contract (to avoid being sued), but where you would turn a cold shoulder to the customer who didn't get their milk, I'd give them a free month's supply, or extend their contract, or give them twice as much milk. It's called customer service. When we enter into these contracts, we do well by each other to maintain a reasonable business relationship. WotC surely isn't going to "patiently wait a month" if I skip my fees. It's a two-way street. And, luckily, WotC doesn't have your philosophy on customer service and expectations. Luckily, WotC is the milk man that wants to take care of their customer base (because as any business major will tell you, it costs more to get a new customer than to keep an old one - especially those loyal enough to stay with you even though you completely butchered the original vision of the product). Yeah? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
STILL No Character Builder Update?
Top