Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Still no updated FORSAKER?!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 3301624" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>So you have never seen anyone playing a party of evil characters? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> That's clearly not nearly as hard as the forsaker scenario, but your comment just sounded like that.</p><p></p><p>Like others have said, a Forsaker simply doesn't fit in a typical party because others want to play spellcasters, or at least because others want to use magic items. It's not the mechanic which prevent this really (the forsaker pays the costs personally) but the concept itself of someone who believes that magic is a source of evil/wrongness. It's the same as a Paladin who cannot associate with evil characters, the Forsaker should not associate with magic-users (in the general sense).</p><p></p><p>This is typically very very unlikely to happen in a D&D game because (1) magic means power (to everyone except a Forsaker), and (2) magic means fun.</p><p></p><p>But it is certainly possible to setup a game where all PCs hate or mistrust magic and go together well. Eventually the real problem is that in this case everyone should be a Forsaker... otherwise those who don't take the PrCl (but still refuse to use magic for RP reasons) are going to be quite weaker than a normal PC.</p><p></p><p>Clearly the concept of such a game will never be popular enough so that WotC would expand on it. But if they did, it would definitely help if there were other character options to support those who shun magic [e.g. non-magic superior weaponry?]. For example, Vow of Poverty is already one of them. I guess that a VoP Monk and a Forsaker would go together quite well. Two PCs is still not enough, but it's already close to being a party...</p><p></p><p>Otherwise a DM could conceive some sort of compromise. Perhaps the Forsaker in this specific campaign does not hate ALL magic, but only certain magic, so to make it compatible with the party. E.g. if the party has only divine casters, then the Forsaker hates only arcane magic (but still has personal restrictions to ALL magic).</p><p>Or even more selectively, perhaps he has sworn to destroy all "evil magic" from the world, and has received both a supernatural blessing and a curse (that not even the "good magic" will work on him).</p><p>These are not trivial ideas, but with a little work and patience, they could make a Forsaker fit even into the typical D&D party.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 3301624, member: 1465"] So you have never seen anyone playing a party of evil characters? :D That's clearly not nearly as hard as the forsaker scenario, but your comment just sounded like that. Like others have said, a Forsaker simply doesn't fit in a typical party because others want to play spellcasters, or at least because others want to use magic items. It's not the mechanic which prevent this really (the forsaker pays the costs personally) but the concept itself of someone who believes that magic is a source of evil/wrongness. It's the same as a Paladin who cannot associate with evil characters, the Forsaker should not associate with magic-users (in the general sense). This is typically very very unlikely to happen in a D&D game because (1) magic means power (to everyone except a Forsaker), and (2) magic means fun. But it is certainly possible to setup a game where all PCs hate or mistrust magic and go together well. Eventually the real problem is that in this case everyone should be a Forsaker... otherwise those who don't take the PrCl (but still refuse to use magic for RP reasons) are going to be quite weaker than a normal PC. Clearly the concept of such a game will never be popular enough so that WotC would expand on it. But if they did, it would definitely help if there were other character options to support those who shun magic [e.g. non-magic superior weaponry?]. For example, Vow of Poverty is already one of them. I guess that a VoP Monk and a Forsaker would go together quite well. Two PCs is still not enough, but it's already close to being a party... Otherwise a DM could conceive some sort of compromise. Perhaps the Forsaker in this specific campaign does not hate ALL magic, but only certain magic, so to make it compatible with the party. E.g. if the party has only divine casters, then the Forsaker hates only arcane magic (but still has personal restrictions to ALL magic). Or even more selectively, perhaps he has sworn to destroy all "evil magic" from the world, and has received both a supernatural blessing and a curse (that not even the "good magic" will work on him). These are not trivial ideas, but with a little work and patience, they could make a Forsaker fit even into the typical D&D party. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Still no updated FORSAKER?!
Top