Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Still nobody's smart and strong?!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6074762" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Eh, I dunno. When you've got 44 different races to choose from... I find it hard to believe everyone would rush to a STR/INT race just because it existed... seeing as how the only two classes for which that would actually matter would be the Tactical Warlord and the Warrior/Wizard Hybrid.</p><p></p><p>And while I appreciate the sentiment that I can just "make it up myself" or "ignore them altogether"... one of the real issues for me is that WotC just never thought to look at the STR/INT combo as one that some races really should be. With almost 80 different combinations over 44 races... the fact they never saw more than a single race that <em>could</em> be smart and strong I just find to be rather uninspiring and a rather short-sighted.</p><p></p><p>But in terms of eventually having some races that have a STR/INT combo... I think it comes down to just needing to personally houserule. And in that regard, for me the ones that make the most sense that lean towards Tactical Warlord is to make Dragonborn STR; INT/CHA rather than STR; CON/CHA... and for the Hobgoblin to swap out CON for STR (also giving STR; INT/CHA).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6074762, member: 7006"] Eh, I dunno. When you've got 44 different races to choose from... I find it hard to believe everyone would rush to a STR/INT race just because it existed... seeing as how the only two classes for which that would actually matter would be the Tactical Warlord and the Warrior/Wizard Hybrid. And while I appreciate the sentiment that I can just "make it up myself" or "ignore them altogether"... one of the real issues for me is that WotC just never thought to look at the STR/INT combo as one that some races really should be. With almost 80 different combinations over 44 races... the fact they never saw more than a single race that [I]could[/I] be smart and strong I just find to be rather uninspiring and a rather short-sighted. But in terms of eventually having some races that have a STR/INT combo... I think it comes down to just needing to personally houserule. And in that regard, for me the ones that make the most sense that lean towards Tactical Warlord is to make Dragonborn STR; INT/CHA rather than STR; CON/CHA... and for the Hobgoblin to swap out CON for STR (also giving STR; INT/CHA). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Still nobody's smart and strong?!?
Top