Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[STILL RECRUITING ALTERNATES] Lobo's Eberron Game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ferrix" data-source="post: 2017990" data-attributes="member: 6115"><p>I don't think reducing/changing the manner in which Fighters gain feats does anything but harm a class that really doesn't need any harming. By house ruling an increase in the number of feats every character gets, you are doing a greater service to non-fighters (who don't get many feats) than you are to fighters.</p><p></p><p>A normal non-fighter gets (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18) 7 feats without your house rule, 11 with your house rule. That's is an increase of over half again as many feats (around a 57% increase). A normal fighter gets 18 feats without your house rule, 22 with. That's around a 22% increase.</p><p></p><p>Statistically, it actually reduces the effectiveness of the fighter's only ability (bonus feats) by quite a bit by boosting up the other classes. If I were to do anything to the fighter, I'd actually try to improve it somehow, perhaps more skill points, a second good save (heck the warmain gets a medium will save), or more along the lines of a dedicated fighter, an ability to have basically a personalized weapon (like the kensai ability or samurai from OA), or Item Familiar from UA.</p><p></p><p>Andy's fighter replaces all but three of the chooseable bonus feats with set abilities, many of them redundant (getting weapon focus/specialization in three groups) which would only be good for a generalist fighter. Additionally the chooseable bonus feats are at 10, 14 and 18. Leaving your major customization option to high levels, everything else being mostly set for you. Heck, what if you never wanted to take weapon focus and weapon specialization? Andy's fighter makes the fighter more like the monk, in that fighters end up being a lot more of the same old, same old. Without the massively possible customization they have.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A psionic version of the class would be a spiffy idea, I've never seen a psionic paladin, but I can imagine one with the religious system the Kalashtar have. Well, I need to take a regional feat from there anyways, and it's either Strong Mind or Wild Talent. Strong Mind is bleh cause it's only effective against psionics, and if I have a +1 power point per level from my race, Wild Talent is a piddling 2 pp. The only reason I had actually wanted more pp was for a deep crystal weapon. But if we work up a psionic paladin, I'll think more on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ferrix, post: 2017990, member: 6115"] I don't think reducing/changing the manner in which Fighters gain feats does anything but harm a class that really doesn't need any harming. By house ruling an increase in the number of feats every character gets, you are doing a greater service to non-fighters (who don't get many feats) than you are to fighters. A normal non-fighter gets (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18) 7 feats without your house rule, 11 with your house rule. That's is an increase of over half again as many feats (around a 57% increase). A normal fighter gets 18 feats without your house rule, 22 with. That's around a 22% increase. Statistically, it actually reduces the effectiveness of the fighter's only ability (bonus feats) by quite a bit by boosting up the other classes. If I were to do anything to the fighter, I'd actually try to improve it somehow, perhaps more skill points, a second good save (heck the warmain gets a medium will save), or more along the lines of a dedicated fighter, an ability to have basically a personalized weapon (like the kensai ability or samurai from OA), or Item Familiar from UA. Andy's fighter replaces all but three of the chooseable bonus feats with set abilities, many of them redundant (getting weapon focus/specialization in three groups) which would only be good for a generalist fighter. Additionally the chooseable bonus feats are at 10, 14 and 18. Leaving your major customization option to high levels, everything else being mostly set for you. Heck, what if you never wanted to take weapon focus and weapon specialization? Andy's fighter makes the fighter more like the monk, in that fighters end up being a lot more of the same old, same old. Without the massively possible customization they have. A psionic version of the class would be a spiffy idea, I've never seen a psionic paladin, but I can imagine one with the religious system the Kalashtar have. Well, I need to take a regional feat from there anyways, and it's either Strong Mind or Wild Talent. Strong Mind is bleh cause it's only effective against psionics, and if I have a +1 power point per level from my race, Wild Talent is a piddling 2 pp. The only reason I had actually wanted more pp was for a deep crystal weapon. But if we work up a psionic paladin, I'll think more on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[STILL RECRUITING ALTERNATES] Lobo's Eberron Game
Top