Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stoneskin debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michaluk" data-source="post: 3595382" data-attributes="member: 45232"><p>Exaclty, it works just like an other spell that discharges under certain conditions. Meaning, the condition happens, then the spell goes away. When your character is hit, he has DR 10, so the hit does 10 less damage. The stone skin spell has now met is limit of 150 damage (in fact it is up to 159 damage) and discharges.</p><p></p><p>There's no need to revise an existing rule (DR) when it works just fine as written and intended. If one interpretation works with existing rules and one does not, the one that does is correct.</p><p></p><p>An additional interpretation: The discharging of the spell works like a readied action. Think of it as the spell having a readied action to end if it absorbs 150 damage. Then, resolve it like a regular readied action. You get hit and have DR 10. This is negated and puts stone skin over 150, so it discharges. But, as per readied actions, the discharging is resolved before the damage that triggers it. In this case, the stone skine discharges and winds up not absorbing any damage from the final hit!</p><p></p><p>I personally think that stone skin absorbs 10 damage on the last hit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michaluk, post: 3595382, member: 45232"] Exaclty, it works just like an other spell that discharges under certain conditions. Meaning, the condition happens, then the spell goes away. When your character is hit, he has DR 10, so the hit does 10 less damage. The stone skin spell has now met is limit of 150 damage (in fact it is up to 159 damage) and discharges. There's no need to revise an existing rule (DR) when it works just fine as written and intended. If one interpretation works with existing rules and one does not, the one that does is correct. An additional interpretation: The discharging of the spell works like a readied action. Think of it as the spell having a readied action to end if it absorbs 150 damage. Then, resolve it like a regular readied action. You get hit and have DR 10. This is negated and puts stone skin over 150, so it discharges. But, as per readied actions, the discharging is resolved before the damage that triggers it. In this case, the stone skine discharges and winds up not absorbing any damage from the final hit! I personally think that stone skin absorbs 10 damage on the last hit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stoneskin debate
Top