Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stop Yapping, Start Playing: Trimming GM Descriptions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DinoInDisguise" data-source="post: 9767050" data-attributes="member: 7045806"><p>I think the way I'd recommend is a bit different. I'd actually alternate the staccato prose of the technical writing, and the longer flowing prose often used. If you alternate the two, short-long-short-long you can actually give your writing, and your spoken word, a rhythm. You can do this in different cadences such as, short-short-long, or short-long-long. Each one will convey a different feeling. If you do it well, your writing or speaking will have a sing-song like cadence to it.</p><p></p><p>This has benefits in how your writing and spoken word are read or heard.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">You can create emphasis. A short sentence after a long one stands out. It's more effective than an exclamation point in many ways.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">You can control the pacing. Short sentences speed things up; long sentences slow things down. Alternating lets you subtly manipulate how the audience perceives the text or speech. They will remember a short phrase after a long one, more than they will remember the long one. If you use all one or the other, you will bore the audience, just like a TTRPG game with bad pacing would.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">You can create tension or drama. Long sentences can immerse, short ones can shock, clarify, or deliver humor. It's a good way to land a joke, go long-long-short, with the short being the punch line. You can do the same in rhetorical writing to make points land harder.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Done well it increases engagement by keeping the audience's attention. It does this much like a song does. It gives the words a pull, or force behind them that moves the audience forward. This can make disengaging feel awkward.</li> </ol><p></p><p>So really we should vary the length of our sentences to maximize the effectiveness of what we say or write. Look back on the great speakers of the last hundred years. You will see exactly this. Long flowing sentences, followed by short, punchy sentences.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>EDIT:</p><p></p><p>For demonstration purposes, an example;</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You might notice the tension of the writing escalates at the end, just as the tension of the scene portrayed does. That's one of the effects you can give with just a bit of variety. Hope that helps.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DinoInDisguise, post: 9767050, member: 7045806"] I think the way I'd recommend is a bit different. I'd actually alternate the staccato prose of the technical writing, and the longer flowing prose often used. If you alternate the two, short-long-short-long you can actually give your writing, and your spoken word, a rhythm. You can do this in different cadences such as, short-short-long, or short-long-long. Each one will convey a different feeling. If you do it well, your writing or speaking will have a sing-song like cadence to it. This has benefits in how your writing and spoken word are read or heard. [LIST=1] [*]You can create emphasis. A short sentence after a long one stands out. It's more effective than an exclamation point in many ways. [*]You can control the pacing. Short sentences speed things up; long sentences slow things down. Alternating lets you subtly manipulate how the audience perceives the text or speech. They will remember a short phrase after a long one, more than they will remember the long one. If you use all one or the other, you will bore the audience, just like a TTRPG game with bad pacing would. [*]You can create tension or drama. Long sentences can immerse, short ones can shock, clarify, or deliver humor. It's a good way to land a joke, go long-long-short, with the short being the punch line. You can do the same in rhetorical writing to make points land harder. [*]Done well it increases engagement by keeping the audience's attention. It does this much like a song does. It gives the words a pull, or force behind them that moves the audience forward. This can make disengaging feel awkward. [/LIST] So really we should vary the length of our sentences to maximize the effectiveness of what we say or write. Look back on the great speakers of the last hundred years. You will see exactly this. Long flowing sentences, followed by short, punchy sentences. EDIT: For demonstration purposes, an example; You might notice the tension of the writing escalates at the end, just as the tension of the scene portrayed does. That's one of the effects you can give with just a bit of variety. Hope that helps. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stop Yapping, Start Playing: Trimming GM Descriptions
Top