Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 2059946" data-attributes="member: 478">I like the Take 10 and Take 20 rules, they are great! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Very little is more stupid then just having to roll a single search check and not being able to take more time to search to get a better result. The good thing with Take 20 is, that you do not get a bonus to your roll, so you cannot act outside of your actual ability. You just get your best result automatically. Sounds just about right.Forensics would be rather unreliable, if they had to actually "roll" for their "search checks". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />The enemy of taking 20 is the environment. If there is enough time to search thoroughly then why not do it?But if time is not always available in abundance, if lingering in one place for long carries a certain risk, then you would have to decide if you want to take that risk. If there is no risk and no time pressure, then there is no reason not to do it. And rightly so.ByeThanee</blockquote>