Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stormwind Fallacy and Vonklaude's observation on limitations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pneumatik" data-source="post: 6705511" data-attributes="member: 21087"><p>The thing that seems odd to me about not doing some amount of optimizing is that adventurers are killers. Their job is putting themselves into clearly dangerous situations over and over again. From an RP situation I can't see how surviving fights can't be a reasonable priority for a PC. I don't see what's unreasonable about a PC who makes every decision about personal improvement based on what will make them the best killer. And people who have a party role of getting into melee who don't optimize to survive melee would, in a realistic world, die sooner and more often.</p><p></p><p>I'm not trying to defend players who are jerks, or who optimize around questionable rules, but if there's straightforward and rule-compliant way to design a tank that makes the PC more effective in combat then the professional tank PC will rationally want to make those decisions. If that means that every tank plays the same class with the same build, then in-game either everyone who wants to be a professional tank will learn that build, or every adventuring party will try to recruit people with that build.</p><p></p><p>I think the idea extends to other party roles, too. If a PC is the party's sneaky thief then they should have a build optimized for being a sneaky thief. In-game sneaks who don't use that build will either get themselves or their party killed. I think the argument is even stronger for party faces or healers, who will get their entire party killed if they're not good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pneumatik, post: 6705511, member: 21087"] The thing that seems odd to me about not doing some amount of optimizing is that adventurers are killers. Their job is putting themselves into clearly dangerous situations over and over again. From an RP situation I can't see how surviving fights can't be a reasonable priority for a PC. I don't see what's unreasonable about a PC who makes every decision about personal improvement based on what will make them the best killer. And people who have a party role of getting into melee who don't optimize to survive melee would, in a realistic world, die sooner and more often. I'm not trying to defend players who are jerks, or who optimize around questionable rules, but if there's straightforward and rule-compliant way to design a tank that makes the PC more effective in combat then the professional tank PC will rationally want to make those decisions. If that means that every tank plays the same class with the same build, then in-game either everyone who wants to be a professional tank will learn that build, or every adventuring party will try to recruit people with that build. I think the idea extends to other party roles, too. If a PC is the party's sneaky thief then they should have a build optimized for being a sneaky thief. In-game sneaks who don't use that build will either get themselves or their party killed. I think the argument is even stronger for party faces or healers, who will get their entire party killed if they're not good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stormwind Fallacy and Vonklaude's observation on limitations
Top