Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribble" data-source="post: 5683186" data-attributes="member: 23977">Eh... I would argue there is almost always a unifying theme that the other build towards. But I don't want to get into another Picard debate. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":P" title="Stick out tongue    :P"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":P" />Aside from that- do they include them, do you think just by default? The "Organic" mode?I guess I'm wondering what would happen if people focused on them from the start.Have you tried the other way? I don't know about necessary, but I'm curious about what would come of having one though.I wonder if it would serve to guide the story towards the driving theme, and serve as a sort of, screen upon which the ramifications of the theme show up most clearly... if that makes sense?Hrmm, that's a good question? Do you think it would? I don't know if I'm arguing that there always be an "average person" but instead just one person carries the main question, while the others serve as exaggerated viewpoints?Is it much different then the idea of say alignments? If we have a good player, an evil player and a neutral player, the Neutral player would serve sort of the same role wouldn't he?That's an interesting question- because I think that would depend on the viewpoint of the DM mostly wouldn't it? Since he controls the surroundings and the adventures, and NPCs et al...</blockquote>

Verification