Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stranger Things and D&D at Last: A Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 7778233" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>Which shouldn't be an issue if you only want to face off against a higher-level NPC. </p><p></p><p>This isn't a question of "attacking a monster that's immune to damage," or "attacking a greater deity." Those, after all, have stats that you can examine to see <em>why</em> that wouldn't work (well, most of the deities don't yet, but there are some <a href="https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/240211/Gods-and-Goddesses-a-5th-Edition-Supplement" target="_blank">great supplements</a> for that). This is just a character that's higher-level than the PCs, and yet has been expressly declared to be invincible insofar as they're concerned. That's an element of railroading, akin to telling the PCs "you don't want to go into the forest? Okay, but every other direction is blocked off by massive flooding. Indefinitely. You can try to go through the floodwaters, but you'll take 1d6+8 damage per round, every round, no save. You <em>probably</em> want to go through the forest." Presenting a choice of "my way or your characters will die" is a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson%27s_choice" target="_blank">Hobson's choice</a>, which is simply no choice by another name. </p><p></p><p>That's not really something you want to teach in a starter set. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p><p></p><p>EDIT: And in an attempt to head off the inevitable <em>reduction ad absurdum</em>, no, this doesn't mean that the DM should never disallow things. If a character has no particular means of attempting something, then they have no method to even make the attempt; likewise some attempts are guaranteed to fail due simply due to the scope of what's being attempted (e.g. your character can't destroy a mountain in one hit). But that's not what's being discussed here. What's being discussed here is something that is <em>normally</em> permitted under the game rules being disallowed by the GM (not just by explicitly saying no, but also by making all such attempts automatically fail where they wouldn't otherwise) for the purpose of trying to advance a particular plot/narrative progression over the players' agency. <em>That's</em> the issue that I'm raising.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 7778233, member: 8461"] Which shouldn't be an issue if you only want to face off against a higher-level NPC. This isn't a question of "attacking a monster that's immune to damage," or "attacking a greater deity." Those, after all, have stats that you can examine to see [I]why[/I] that wouldn't work (well, most of the deities don't yet, but there are some [url=https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product/240211/Gods-and-Goddesses-a-5th-Edition-Supplement]great supplements[/url] for that). This is just a character that's higher-level than the PCs, and yet has been expressly declared to be invincible insofar as they're concerned. That's an element of railroading, akin to telling the PCs "you don't want to go into the forest? Okay, but every other direction is blocked off by massive flooding. Indefinitely. You can try to go through the floodwaters, but you'll take 1d6+8 damage per round, every round, no save. You [I]probably[/I] want to go through the forest." Presenting a choice of "my way or your characters will die" is a [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson%27s_choice]Hobson's choice[/url], which is simply no choice by another name. That's not really something you want to teach in a starter set. :erm: EDIT: And in an attempt to head off the inevitable [I]reduction ad absurdum[/I], no, this doesn't mean that the DM should never disallow things. If a character has no particular means of attempting something, then they have no method to even make the attempt; likewise some attempts are guaranteed to fail due simply due to the scope of what's being attempted (e.g. your character can't destroy a mountain in one hit). But that's not what's being discussed here. What's being discussed here is something that is [I]normally[/I] permitted under the game rules being disallowed by the GM (not just by explicitly saying no, but also by making all such attempts automatically fail where they wouldn't otherwise) for the purpose of trying to advance a particular plot/narrative progression over the players' agency. [I]That's[/I] the issue that I'm raising. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Stranger Things and D&D at Last: A Review
Top