Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greenfield" data-source="post: 5981521" data-attributes="member: 6669384">My own thoughts are that we need more intelligence on the enemy.&nbsp; It's too large a force for them to be living off the land, and far too extensive for them to be conjuring food to feed them all.&nbsp; If their supplies are centralized, they're an obvious target point.&nbsp; Destroying them would help if this were a prolonged siege situation.&nbsp; As things are, loss of those supplies would simply force their hand, prompting them to begin their assault sooner.Identifying leaders, and spell casters in specific, would be a great help.&nbsp; Fireballs dropped from orbit (high fliers) always feel good, but sometimes a knife in the dark is the better choice.&nbsp; And that really depends on how good our Rogue and ShadowDancer are at their jobs.One big concern is that if we do any coordinated strike at any one of the four camps, the other three will simply move in and slaughter the relatively weak defenders left inside.We also have a temptation:&nbsp; They have siege engines.&nbsp; Destroying them will slow their assault capacity.&nbsp; But if we could capture them intact...Anyway, that's my thought process so far.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greenfield, post: 5981521, member: 6669384"] My own thoughts are that we need more intelligence on the enemy. It's too large a force for them to be living off the land, and far too extensive for them to be conjuring food to feed them all. If their supplies are centralized, they're an obvious target point. Destroying them would help if this were a prolonged siege situation. As things are, loss of those supplies would simply force their hand, prompting them to begin their assault sooner. Identifying leaders, and spell casters in specific, would be a great help. Fireballs dropped from orbit (high fliers) always feel good, but sometimes a knife in the dark is the better choice. And that really depends on how good our Rogue and ShadowDancer are at their jobs. One big concern is that if we do any coordinated strike at any one of the four camps, the other three will simply move in and slaughter the relatively weak defenders left inside. We also have a temptation: They have siege engines. Destroying them will slow their assault capacity. But if we could capture them intact... Anyway, that's my thought process so far. [/QUOTE]

Verification