Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Streaming Movies and Power Rankings: A Reverie on Max's A24 and Netflix's Rebel Ridge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 9465231" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>So, I saw this movie differently than many others.</p><p></p><p>If they wanted a movie with a strong statement, they could have decisively chosen one side of the political spectrum or not. As it is, and how it begins and how it ends I suspect that in the original script, it was just that. However, someone higher up said...this may not be a good idea to alienate half of your audience (a cue which others probably could take a hint from in some arenas of media, especially when they wonder why they are losing money and audiences on things they make and wonder why that is). Instead, they then tried to make it so undeterminable that at times, you do not really understand what is happening. There is no message in looking at the film in that manner.</p><p></p><p>Others see it as a warning to Americans, particularly those in the states about the horrors of war and whether we should be seeming so eager for one to occur.</p><p></p><p>I see it differently than either. I see it as a movie about War Journalism. It is saying...you cannot get emotional about this. YOU CANNOT get invested in this. You cannot get invested in one side or the other. The second you get invested...you die.</p><p></p><p>So...what follows is massive spoilers...</p><p></p><p>[SPOILER="Civil War - Don't get emotionally attached"] The main journalist that we follow starts off the film emotionally neutral. They are just there to take pictures and get the story. They know what to expect. However, we see the first moment of weakness as they save a bystander/hopeful photographer. This young photographer grows from being emotional (as we see throughout the first part of the film) to getting more and more hardened against the state of things. At the same time, the main character gets more and more invested and more and more emotional until near the end she cannot even move at one point due to what is happening around her. You see as one gets more emotional and invested in others, they get hurt and die. Those who do not, or keep their neutral stance to simply be journalists...survive[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p>I think if others see this message, this is most likely to be the most longstanding film of those listed as it could become a standard film for some journalist classes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 9465231, member: 4348"] So, I saw this movie differently than many others. If they wanted a movie with a strong statement, they could have decisively chosen one side of the political spectrum or not. As it is, and how it begins and how it ends I suspect that in the original script, it was just that. However, someone higher up said...this may not be a good idea to alienate half of your audience (a cue which others probably could take a hint from in some arenas of media, especially when they wonder why they are losing money and audiences on things they make and wonder why that is). Instead, they then tried to make it so undeterminable that at times, you do not really understand what is happening. There is no message in looking at the film in that manner. Others see it as a warning to Americans, particularly those in the states about the horrors of war and whether we should be seeming so eager for one to occur. I see it differently than either. I see it as a movie about War Journalism. It is saying...you cannot get emotional about this. YOU CANNOT get invested in this. You cannot get invested in one side or the other. The second you get invested...you die. So...what follows is massive spoilers... [SPOILER="Civil War - Don't get emotionally attached"] The main journalist that we follow starts off the film emotionally neutral. They are just there to take pictures and get the story. They know what to expect. However, we see the first moment of weakness as they save a bystander/hopeful photographer. This young photographer grows from being emotional (as we see throughout the first part of the film) to getting more and more hardened against the state of things. At the same time, the main character gets more and more invested and more and more emotional until near the end she cannot even move at one point due to what is happening around her. You see as one gets more emotional and invested in others, they get hurt and die. Those who do not, or keep their neutral stance to simply be journalists...survive[/SPOILER] I think if others see this message, this is most likely to be the most longstanding film of those listed as it could become a standard film for some journalist classes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Streaming Movies and Power Rankings: A Reverie on Max's A24 and Netflix's Rebel Ridge
Top