Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Streaming Services: Power Rankings Summer 2023, and What's Up With Paramount+
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9067124" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>No. It isn't. Again, this has been a major topic in terms of the Business.</p><p></p><p>I don't know how many more times this has to be said. Prime is considered an also-ran, despite the high subscriber numbers, because of flops like this show. You might say, "Well, some people watched it. It can't be a flop!"</p><p></p><p>I don't think you fully comprehend what the ROI is. It cost $90 million <em>an episode</em>. For a point of comparison- do you know Foundation? The super expensive Apple+ show set in space? It cost $45 million - for the entire season.</p><p></p><p>That's right. Every single episode of this show (which had eight episodes) cost more than the entire budget of almost every show ever made. Every episode costs more than a season of the Witcher. More than a season of Wednesday. More than a season of The Boys. More than a season of Umbrella Academy. More than a season of Ozark.</p><p></p><p>In fact, every single episode of this show costs more than the entire series runs of most hit shows on other networks. When you are spending that kind of money, you need a lot better return. It's just not sustainable.</p><p></p><p>If you have any actual evidence of your assertion- that this type of spending on content is, in fact, not just some kind of new-fangled Underwear Gnome scheme, provide it. Because it's this type of spending on content that led to all the retrenchment we've been seeing this year, starting with Zaslav and continuing on with the strike(s) - which the studios haven't avoided because they will allow them to get out of some of the onerous content contract they signed.</p><p></p><p>Again, the repeated assertion that a show that is, by far, the most expensive show in the history of television is somehow a success for Prime despite the fairly well-known and well-reported evidence otherwise - and not in clickbait articles, but in the industry press, is somewhat ... odd. Perhaps Bezos and co. are playing 4-D Chess, or perhaps they overspent for subpar content. I'll put my money down on overspending, given that it seems to be part and parcel with the structural issues that Prime has had.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9067124, member: 7023840"] No. It isn't. Again, this has been a major topic in terms of the Business. I don't know how many more times this has to be said. Prime is considered an also-ran, despite the high subscriber numbers, because of flops like this show. You might say, "Well, some people watched it. It can't be a flop!" I don't think you fully comprehend what the ROI is. It cost $90 million [I]an episode[/I]. For a point of comparison- do you know Foundation? The super expensive Apple+ show set in space? It cost $45 million - for the entire season. That's right. Every single episode of this show (which had eight episodes) cost more than the entire budget of almost every show ever made. Every episode costs more than a season of the Witcher. More than a season of Wednesday. More than a season of The Boys. More than a season of Umbrella Academy. More than a season of Ozark. In fact, every single episode of this show costs more than the entire series runs of most hit shows on other networks. When you are spending that kind of money, you need a lot better return. It's just not sustainable. If you have any actual evidence of your assertion- that this type of spending on content is, in fact, not just some kind of new-fangled Underwear Gnome scheme, provide it. Because it's this type of spending on content that led to all the retrenchment we've been seeing this year, starting with Zaslav and continuing on with the strike(s) - which the studios haven't avoided because they will allow them to get out of some of the onerous content contract they signed. Again, the repeated assertion that a show that is, by far, the most expensive show in the history of television is somehow a success for Prime despite the fairly well-known and well-reported evidence otherwise - and not in clickbait articles, but in the industry press, is somewhat ... odd. Perhaps Bezos and co. are playing 4-D Chess, or perhaps they overspent for subpar content. I'll put my money down on overspending, given that it seems to be part and parcel with the structural issues that Prime has had. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Streaming Services: Power Rankings Summer 2023, and What's Up With Paramount+
Top