Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Strength, creature size, hp, damage...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 385643" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>These types of scientific debates are fine in D&D, as long as you accept at the end of the day that science takes a backseat to fun and game balance.</p><p></p><p>I'd say that Strength is more abstract than you calculated. For example, I have a Human and a 12' Giant. The Giant is 8 times the mass, so yes, the pressure would be twice as much on his skeleton. However, I'd say that the Giant's skeleton would be thicker to compensate, as you mentioned. This makes for a thicker-looking creature; it won't be exactly the same proportions.</p><p>(Example: picture a Dwarf as being a scaled-up Gnome. Thicker body structure. Or picture a 3E Halfling as being a scaled-down Human, with thinner bone structure giving them the higher agility)</p><p></p><p>So far so good, but how does that apply to STR scores? Just because I weigh eight times as much as you doesn't mean I can hit you eight times as hard, because there's a speed factor there. If my arm weighs eight times as much, and my muscles have four times the cross section and twice the length, do I still break even? Probably not; I'd swing slower, so I'm slightly less likely to hit you (the -1 attack penalty), less likely to dodge out of your way (the -1 AC penalty), and when I DO hit, you'll take more damage thanks to the increased force behind the blow (the higher STR) but it won't scale up as much as my weight does.</p><p>Now maybe I DON'T swing slower, but that'd require a different muscle structure, which means you can't assume scaling up keeps things the same.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't mean I can't support my own weight. It just means I can't hit you eight times as hard.</p><p></p><p>Now, you were arguing that bipeds and quadrapeds should scale the same. But there, it's a question of what fraction of your musculature is oriented in the correct direction. If a quadraped increased in size by a factor of 8, its carrying capacity increases by the same factor because its entire body is structured in a way to let it balance on its legs. It increases the pressure on each leg, of course, but the creature is still stable and the load acts the same as the creature's normal body. That is, assuming you balanced the load correctly around its center of gravity.</p><p></p><p>A biped, however, wouldn't increase by a factor of 8. First of all, the load isn't distributed evenly; if you're carrying something, you're carrying it above your center of gravity and off center (either in your arms or on your back). Bipeds aren't automatically stable, either, so you're more concerned with torque around your center of gravity (Force * Distance, and distance is doubled) than you are about pressure on the legs. Since distance doubles with size doubling, the force you can carry increases by a factor of 4, because your musculature will be built to take 8 times the total torque of before (torque would be resisted by your own body's rotational inertia, which scales by a factor of 8).</p><p>It's the price we pay for having two hands free to punch someone in the face.</p><p></p><p>Just remember: Dragons can fly. Once you accept that, all the physics doesn't matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 385643, member: 3051"] These types of scientific debates are fine in D&D, as long as you accept at the end of the day that science takes a backseat to fun and game balance. I'd say that Strength is more abstract than you calculated. For example, I have a Human and a 12' Giant. The Giant is 8 times the mass, so yes, the pressure would be twice as much on his skeleton. However, I'd say that the Giant's skeleton would be thicker to compensate, as you mentioned. This makes for a thicker-looking creature; it won't be exactly the same proportions. (Example: picture a Dwarf as being a scaled-up Gnome. Thicker body structure. Or picture a 3E Halfling as being a scaled-down Human, with thinner bone structure giving them the higher agility) So far so good, but how does that apply to STR scores? Just because I weigh eight times as much as you doesn't mean I can hit you eight times as hard, because there's a speed factor there. If my arm weighs eight times as much, and my muscles have four times the cross section and twice the length, do I still break even? Probably not; I'd swing slower, so I'm slightly less likely to hit you (the -1 attack penalty), less likely to dodge out of your way (the -1 AC penalty), and when I DO hit, you'll take more damage thanks to the increased force behind the blow (the higher STR) but it won't scale up as much as my weight does. Now maybe I DON'T swing slower, but that'd require a different muscle structure, which means you can't assume scaling up keeps things the same. This doesn't mean I can't support my own weight. It just means I can't hit you eight times as hard. Now, you were arguing that bipeds and quadrapeds should scale the same. But there, it's a question of what fraction of your musculature is oriented in the correct direction. If a quadraped increased in size by a factor of 8, its carrying capacity increases by the same factor because its entire body is structured in a way to let it balance on its legs. It increases the pressure on each leg, of course, but the creature is still stable and the load acts the same as the creature's normal body. That is, assuming you balanced the load correctly around its center of gravity. A biped, however, wouldn't increase by a factor of 8. First of all, the load isn't distributed evenly; if you're carrying something, you're carrying it above your center of gravity and off center (either in your arms or on your back). Bipeds aren't automatically stable, either, so you're more concerned with torque around your center of gravity (Force * Distance, and distance is doubled) than you are about pressure on the legs. Since distance doubles with size doubling, the force you can carry increases by a factor of 4, because your musculature will be built to take 8 times the total torque of before (torque would be resisted by your own body's rotational inertia, which scales by a factor of 8). It's the price we pay for having two hands free to punch someone in the face. Just remember: Dragons can fly. Once you accept that, all the physics doesn't matter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Strength, creature size, hp, damage...
Top