Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5948117" data-attributes="member: 82425">I am on your side. Rangers are good.That said....shhhhh. Count to ten. Relax.I was of the position that the Class/Background/Theme approach could have covered off the ranger (paladin too for that matter). Why? Because good design requires people to be open minded. New ideas can bring revolution, but if we close our minds, nothing ever changes. Does that apply this time around? Well, I kept my mind open to the idea, and eventually, after considering all positions, decided the ranger is its own class. Hurah! No change this time around, but at least I considered the possibility.Its not the fact that I have come to the conclusion that the ranger should be its own class that makes me happy. Im happy that I kept my mind open and listened to all arguments.I understand the position of others and respect their right to their opinionsThis quote earlierI will give you the benefit of the doubt that this was a mis-type and its was the position of the &quot;crowd&quot; you didnt like, and not the crowd itself.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 5948117, member: 82425"] I am on your side. Rangers are good. That said....shhhhh. Count to ten. Relax. I was of the position that the Class/Background/Theme approach could have covered off the ranger (paladin too for that matter). Why? Because good design requires people to be open minded. New ideas can bring revolution, but if we close our minds, nothing ever changes. Does that apply this time around? Well, I kept my mind open to the idea, and eventually, after considering all positions, decided the ranger is its own class. Hurah! No change this time around, but at least I considered the possibility. Its not the fact that I have come to the conclusion that the ranger should be its own class that makes me happy. Im happy that I kept my mind open and listened to all arguments. I understand the position of others and respect their right to their opinions This quote earlier I will give you the benefit of the doubt that this was a mis-type and its was the [U]position[/U] of the "crowd" you didnt like, and not the crowd itself. [/QUOTE]

Verification